| Revision as of 08:18, 8 July 2014 editSerialjoepsycho (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers6,242 edits →socks and Arbpia: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:49, 9 July 2014 edit undoSerialjoepsycho (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers6,242 edits →BLPN: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Regarding ]. It does seem that the sanctions at least in some part are having an effect. I don't think your concerns are yours alone. I wonder if the best action might be to open a request for amendment at arbcom. ] (]) 08:18, 8 July 2014 (UTC) | Regarding ]. It does seem that the sanctions at least in some part are having an effect. I don't think your concerns are yours alone. I wonder if the best action might be to open a request for amendment at arbcom. ] (]) 08:18, 8 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == BLPN == | |||
| I pinged you on BLPN while you were banned. Thought perhaps you could have missed it. You were brought up in the discussion on IPT there. You were also mentioned on Atsme talk page by me. If I did I didn't mean to misstate your position. I'm telling you now so that if you are interested you can review what was said in relation to you.] (]) 22:49, 9 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:49, 9 July 2014
socks and Arbpia
Regarding Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests#IP_area_still_being_swamped_by_socks. It does seem that the sanctions at least in some part are having an effect. I don't think your concerns are yours alone. I wonder if the best action might be to open a request for amendment at arbcom. Serialjoepsycho (talk) 08:18, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
BLPN
I pinged you on BLPN while you were banned. Thought perhaps you could have missed it. You were brought up in the discussion on IPT there. You were also mentioned on Atsme talk page by me. If I did I didn't mean to misstate your position. I'm telling you now so that if you are interested you can review what was said in relation to you.Serialjoepsycho (talk) 22:49, 9 July 2014 (UTC)