| Revision as of 07:00, 10 July 2014 editSolarra (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,143 editsm →ARBCOM Discretionary Sanctions: formatting fix.← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:00, 10 July 2014 edit undoShrike (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,544 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Israeli settlement. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| <br> | <br> | ||
| Be careful with this topic field, it is subjected to a 1RR when it comes to editing. ] ] ߷ ] 07:00, 10 July 2014 (UTC) | Be careful with this topic field, it is subjected to a 1RR when it comes to editing. ] ] ߷ ] 07:00, 10 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == July 2014 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. {{Break}}''All I/P conflict articles is under 1RR per ]''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (])/] 07:00, 10 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:00, 10 July 2014
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Israeli settlement, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 03:17, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
ARBCOM Discretionary Sanctions
As a result of an arbitration case, broad editing restrictions apply to all pages broadly related the Arab-Israeli conflict. These sanctions are described at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and a brief summary is included below:
- Any uninvolved administrator may, at their own discretion, impose sanctions on editors working in the area of conflict who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process.
- Possible sanctions include blocks, bans and other editing restrictions.
- A one revert per twenty-four hours restriction applies to articles broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, editors may be blocked without warning if they breach this restriction. See here for more information.
Be careful with this topic field, it is subjected to a 1RR when it comes to editing. ♥ Solarra ♥ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 07:00, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Your recent editing history at Israeli settlement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
All I/P conflict articles is under 1RR per WP:ARBPIA Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 07:00, 10 July 2014 (UTC)