User talk:Siggasonswein: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 10:50, 16 July 2014 editJacona (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers63,687 edits Notification of good faith revert found using STiki ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:34, 16 July 2014 edit undoLoriendrew (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers61,186 edits Warning: Edit warring on Kirk Smeaton. (TW)Next edit →
Line 42:		Line 42:
	Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Please take some time to read ] and ]. Thanks!		Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Please take some time to read ] and ]. Thanks!
	Thank you! ] (]) 10:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)		Thank you! ] (]) 10:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

			== July 2014 ==
			] You currently appear to be engaged in an ] according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
			Please be particularly aware, ] states:
			# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
			# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
			If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] ] 11:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:34, 16 July 2014

Siggasonswein, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Siggasonswein! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm The Last Arietta. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Wentbridge, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 16:09, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Kirk Smeaton, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 18:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Barnsdale, you may be blocked from editing. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 18:40, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Castleford. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 18:46, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Wentbridge, Kirk Smeaton, Danelaw, Pontefract, Nottingham, and Norton, Doncaster. Acabashi (talk) 21:33, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did at Wentbridge, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your frequent addition and re-addition of original research without any explanation and adequate sources now constitutes vandalism. Acabashi (talk) 22:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:46, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours for WP:EW, as you did at Wentbridge. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:18, 15 July 2014 (UTC) (added) I have blocked you for only three hours in order to force a pause in the developing edit war in the Wentbridge article. Please read WP:EW, WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:BRD. Please discuss your desired changes to the article at Talk:Wentbridge#The connection between Wentbridge and Robin Hood. Resumption of edit warrior behavior after this short block expires will result on the placement of blocks of longer duration. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:42, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Recent edits to Wentbridge

Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Please take some time to read WP:FIVEPILLARS and WP:NOT. Thanks! Thank you! Jacona (talk) 10:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kirk Smeaton. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 11:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)