| Revision as of 15:47, 3 July 2006 edit63.23.72.79 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:11, 3 July 2006 edit undoErrabee (talk | contribs)7,549 edits rv sex spammerNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| FYI ] | ] 23:27, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | FYI ] | ] 23:27, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *Hi. I also thought you would like to see this. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I think due to several edits the situation under Imperial Russia and the current situation has become entangled in such a way the article is now incorrect. Could you please take a look at it? I also asked ] to look at it. ] 06:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Summary by Alex Bakharev at ] == | |||
| Your have endorsed the summary by Alex Bakharev at ] which misinforms the community. Alex Bakharev wrote about ]: "There is no discussion on the talk page, no suggestions on improving the article". In fact there was (and still is) a discussion on the talk page and solution has been proposed. (Please see ]). I suggest you to withdraw your signature under the summary.--] 08:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:11, 3 July 2006
— archive (2003/11/26 - 2006/01/12) — archive 2 (2006/01/13- 2006/03/07) — archive 3(2006/03/07 - 2006/04/27) — archive 4 (2006/04/28 - 2006/06/25) — Talks about Kven Issue
|
Passée DoubleThanks for your note. Yes, I saw that a very few uses were of a different sort of march (and indeed there is a film called May, among other things). But they don't have to be linked, and being unlinked is better than being linked to the wrong place. Still I am pleased to have achieved edits like this one. Rich Farmbrough 18:16 27 June 2006 (GMT). Re. Japanese datesThank you for providing me with this valuable new information, dear Mikka - in fact, I was merely acting because this particular anonymous user had just been reported at WP:AIV as a recurrent vandal, and who had been blocked just yesterday because of the same editing pattern. Aparently, the lack of any explanation by this editor induced everyone to believe he was merely performing a massive removal of information, and that his activity was nothing but a vandalism spree. I recommend you to make this information available to all the involved parties and the blocking admins, and I leave up to you to instrument the unblocking of the relevant IP addresses. Warm regards, Phædriel ♥ tell me - 15:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC) TfDI think a potentially very disruptive template is on verge of being kept. If you have time, please take a look at this TfD discussion. Regards. 172 | Talk 21:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC) FYI 172 | Talk 23:27, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Olonets RaionI think due to several edits the situation under Imperial Russia and the current situation has become entangled in such a way the article is now incorrect. Could you please take a look at it? I also asked Ezhiki to look at it. Errabee 06:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Summary by Alex Bakharev at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/IrpenYour have endorsed the summary by Alex Bakharev at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Irpen which misinforms the community. Alex Bakharev wrote about Russian architecture: "There is no discussion on the talk page, no suggestions on improving the article". In fact there was (and still is) a discussion on the talk page and solution has been proposed. (Please see Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Irpen#Comment_to_the_summary_by_Alex_Bakharev_and_others). I suggest you to withdraw your signature under the summary.--AndriyK 08:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC) |