Revision as of 16:06, 3 July 2006 editGimmetrow (talk | contribs)Administrators45,380 edits Page move at Canon law (Catholic Church)← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:48, 3 July 2006 edit undoVaquero100 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,798 edits →Page move at []Next edit → | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
== Page move at ]== | == Page move at ]== | ||
I question the reason you gave for the unilateral, undiscussed move, see ], and I request that you self-revert the page move. ] 16:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | I question the reason you gave for the unilateral, undiscussed move, see ], and I request that you self-revert the page move. ] 16:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
Dear Andrew, | |||
I see that you are a VCU graduate. I also attended VCU, lived in the Fan on Park, Floyd and Lombardy. I also have a nephew there now working on his BFA in photography. I was and he is a parishioner at Cathedral Parish (Sacred Heart Cathedral). Those were fine days for me and seeing your user page has brought back good memories of the Village Cafe, Carey Street and shows at the Byrd. | |||
It has also reminded me of some of the worst anti-Catholicism I have ever experienced. In my years there the Cathedral was vandalized by the Jack Chick people when they glued hate posters to the front doors and by ACT UP when they spray painted lewd images on the limestone walls on Good Friday night. We also had several cases of Evangelicals interupting the the Eucharistic Prayer during the mass by walking up and down the aisles yelling and holding up Bibles. Personally, my boss once told me to wash my face on Ash Wednesday or get fired. I quit. | |||
You are now part of the campaign to erradicate the name of the Catholic Church on WP. This is a complex issue and I would request that you see this page before you continue with such efforts: ]. | |||
] 17:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:48, 3 July 2006
Talk Page Archives: |
---|
Archive 1 (9 February – 16 June 2006) |
bibleverses
You might be interested in:
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in the Bible
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in the Gospel of Matthew
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in 1 Esdras
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in 2 Esdras
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in 1 Maccabees
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in 2 Maccabees
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in the Book of Tobit
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in the Book of Judith
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in the Book of Wisdom
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in Ecclesiasticus
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in the Book of Baruch
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in the Story of Susanna
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in Bel and the Dragon
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in Second Chronicles
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in the Book of Ezra
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of chapters and verses in First Kings
Clinkophonist 19:44, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
By the way, I think Rich Farnbrough has a long term plan; he wants 36,000 articles, one for each verse. Creating the Matthew redirects is step 1, step 2 is to change them from redirects to articles - no-one will notice as they won't show up in the article creation logs, and there are too many to simply watch. Clinkophonist 20:18, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Citing to the Bible
As a recent participant in the TfD dicussion on whether {{Bibleverse}} and {{Bibleref}} should be deleted, I wanted to make sure you were aware of the new discussion at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources/Bible. The goal of these discussion is to resolve the concerns raised re GFDL, use of an external cite, etc. Additionally, this page should serve as a location for recording research about the different websites that provide online Bible information. Please edit the summary and join the discussion - thx Trödel 15:17, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Table of Dates in Sacred Heart
Hi Andrew, I noticed the change you made to the dates for the Sacred Heart. I used the format that now appears in Corpus Christi, Pentecost, Trinity Sunday and possibly other Easter based feasts as well. I was attempting a bit of standardisation. If we have a table in Sacred Heart then it would be good to have the same format in these other articles, or use the format in the other articles in Sacred Heart as I did. I'm also unsure why you removed the earliest and latest possible dates. While such facts are not directly relevant to the christian celebration, they are relevant to the topic as a whole, and they do represent useful content. Regards, Arcturus 22:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry - just looked again at your edit. I didn't realise you'd moved the text noted above to a different article. Is there a case for merging the Feast article and the main article - what do you think? Arcturus 23:01, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Re: anon vandalism
Yeah, looks like we both reverted vandalism by the same person... and this is what we get? Oh well, I guess that's WikiLife! :-) romarin 21:08, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
HOlA!
This is the first time I've attempted to use another user's talk page, please correct me if I'm messing it up. :) Regarding the page on Biblical Inerrecny.. I wanted to direct you to the discussion page where I have made an entry for each major edition, please feel free to discuss any improper editing I've done there.. however I feel as if I've been presenting the current scholarly view on the subject only to be reverted to your understanding or opinion on it. Don't get me wrong I'm not assuming anything about your thoughts, only making the observation that what you keep replacing my wrigints with is not consistent with the current stances of adherents to biblical inerrency which is what I undestood the purpose of that article to be. If you disagree.. I welcome you to create a page entitled "critism to inerrency" or some such page and make a comment on the article linking the reader to it. So please take a look at the discussion page. I've previously addressed all the issues and would welcome your thoughts in there. Thanks! --DjSamwise 03:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
I got your message on the Augustinian hypothesis
I agree with Lost Cesaer that your overhaul was excessive and it unnecessarily removed a lot of good content. I don't think you are acting according to consensus on removing a lot of Wikipedians good content. I stated this in the talk page. ken 02:12, 1 July 2006 (UTC)kdbuffalo
Page move at Canon law (Catholic Church)
I question the reason you gave for the unilateral, undiscussed move, see Talk:Canon law (Roman Catholic Church), and I request that you self-revert the page move. Gimmetrow 16:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Dear Andrew,
I see that you are a VCU graduate. I also attended VCU, lived in the Fan on Park, Floyd and Lombardy. I also have a nephew there now working on his BFA in photography. I was and he is a parishioner at Cathedral Parish (Sacred Heart Cathedral). Those were fine days for me and seeing your user page has brought back good memories of the Village Cafe, Carey Street and shows at the Byrd.
It has also reminded me of some of the worst anti-Catholicism I have ever experienced. In my years there the Cathedral was vandalized by the Jack Chick people when they glued hate posters to the front doors and by ACT UP when they spray painted lewd images on the limestone walls on Good Friday night. We also had several cases of Evangelicals interupting the the Eucharistic Prayer during the mass by walking up and down the aisles yelling and holding up Bibles. Personally, my boss once told me to wash my face on Ash Wednesday or get fired. I quit.
You are now part of the campaign to erradicate the name of the Catholic Church on WP. This is a complex issue and I would request that you see this page before you continue with such efforts: CC vs. RCC.