Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dreadstar: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:13, 3 September 2014 view sourceCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 edits Arkon's reverts: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 10:35, 3 September 2014 view source Cailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 edits Arkon's reverts: questionNext edit →
Line 18: Line 18:
*God in heaven, I'm starting to actually become fond of being called Homeslice. Is that wrong??? And apparently, I'm the 'can-do' of homeslices...wow, how could I have ever been insulted by that total compliment!!! Ah, ], you had nice plummage and I knew ye less for that....*sob*. Just please don't tell me...I'm....] - ] <small>]</small> 07:28, 3 September 2014 (UTC) *God in heaven, I'm starting to actually become fond of being called Homeslice. Is that wrong??? And apparently, I'm the 'can-do' of homeslices...wow, how could I have ever been insulted by that total compliment!!! Ah, ], you had nice plummage and I knew ye less for that....*sob*. Just please don't tell me...I'm....] - ] <small>]</small> 07:28, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


== Arkon's reverts == == Arkon's reverts & CS Darrow's block ==


Hi Dreadstar - I'm just noticing that Arkon has twice reverted your redaction of CSDarrow's rhetoric. Men's rights pages are however under 1RR--] <sup>]</sup> 10:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC) Hi Dreadstar - I'm just noticing that Arkon has twice reverted your redaction of CSDarrow's rhetoric. Men's rights pages are however under 1RR--] <sup>]</sup> 10:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

:Also I might add when I report (what I still think was only a borderline BLP violation) my concern was not just WRT the lunatic bit. The real BLP problem IMHO was the description of the author of the source, Richard Dunphy (who's a senior lecturer at the University of Dundee). Which is a clear breach of ] and untrue. However even given that I wouldn't have gone straight to indef just for the BLP edits (I know you've included disruption but you might want to clarify that for a reviewing admin). I know i'm involved but even I would suggest reducing that block. BTW on a purely technical question is that block covered by AC/DS or the normal BLP policy (I'm just interested to know)?--] <sup>]</sup> 10:35, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:35, 3 September 2014

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
Welcome!
   

Archives and sandboxes


In recognition of your efforts on Misplaced Pages and for dedication to law oriented edits, I, Cdogsimmons, award you the Society Barnstar.

Defender

The Mighty Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
In recognition & thanks for your efforts in helping us work our way towards consensus towards making Battle of Washita River a good WP:NPOV (instead of WP:SOAP) article. Still a lotta work to do, but now we can do it, in no small part because of your help. Yksin

Award!

The Vandal Eliminator Award
* I, Stormtracker94, award you the Vandal Eliminator Award for amazing vandal fighting and RC Patrol. STORMTRACKER 94

RL Barnstar

The Real Life Barnstar
- For reporting a situation that could have resulted in a real life massacre I present you this barnstar. Initiative in dealing with situations like this is essential, and for all we know you may have saved lives the moment you posted that. Good work! Thank you. +Hexagon1
Initiative in dealing with situations like this is essential, and for all we know you may have saved lives the moment you posted that. Good work! +Hexagon1
Just be glad you're on the good side, every time I get involved in situations like that, I seem to be the one getting arrested... (kidding, please don't report me Mr. Thoughtpolice-man! :) +Hexagon1

Holy wow. Good job, Dreadstar. --Fang Aili

New comments below this section

Thanks! Dreadstar

Let's all clarify something here

Let's make something clear, I will not allow anyone to attack women or make misogynist edits in Misplaced Pages, nor will I allow those that defend such edits. Dreadstar 06:11, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

That is all well and good, as long as you stick to regular edits that any autoconfirmed user could make (and revert). If you make use of admin functions, you will be held accountable for them and ensure that they're used according to policy and community consensus, which for administrators include being civil and explaining your decisions when asked to justify them. Diego (talk) 08:50, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Can do Homeslice

I'll craft an arb request in the morning. Appreciate you making it so easy. Arkon (talk) 06:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

  • I reverted this comment that I perceived as an uncivil personal attack, but upon further reflection I think everyone should read that this person called me 'homeslice' after I expressed my desire to protect women. I have to wonder what that means; is it an attack or is it a friendly comment meant to express brotherhood - well, I mean even though this editor is taking me to ArbCom...for what I don't know, but I guess we'll find out tomorrow. Well, depends on timezone, I guess. . Dreadstar 06:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
For anyone interested, here's the draft of this unbelievably solid ArbCom case against me. How will I ever survive this? Thank all the gods it's not....nooo.....pseudoscience!!! NOOOOO! Dreadstar 07:19, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
  • God in heaven, I'm starting to actually become fond of being called Homeslice. Is that wrong??? And apparently, I'm the 'can-do' of homeslices...wow, how could I have ever been insulted by that total compliment!!! Ah, poor polly, you had nice plummage and I knew ye less for that....*sob*. Just please don't tell me...I'm....Honkytonk Homeslice - Dreadstar 07:28, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Arkon's reverts & CS Darrow's block

Hi Dreadstar - I'm just noticing that Arkon has twice reverted your redaction of CSDarrow's rhetoric. Men's rights pages are however under 1RR--Cailil 10:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Also I might add when I report (what I still think was only a borderline BLP violation) my concern was not just WRT the lunatic bit. The real BLP problem IMHO was the description of the author of the source, Richard Dunphy (who's a senior lecturer at the University of Dundee). Which is a clear breach of WP:HARM and untrue. However even given that I wouldn't have gone straight to indef just for the BLP edits (I know you've included disruption but you might want to clarify that for a reviewing admin). I know i'm involved but even I would suggest reducing that block. BTW on a purely technical question is that block covered by AC/DS or the normal BLP policy (I'm just interested to know)?--Cailil 10:35, 3 September 2014 (UTC)