| Revision as of 20:12, 9 September 2014 editThe Banner (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers125,454 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:18, 9 September 2014 edit undoThe Banner (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers125,454 edits →Marcelina VahekeniNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| *'''Redirect''' to ], along with four or five others who are in the same boat (i.e. did not place in the Miss Universe contest). ] (]) 10:59, 9 September 2014 (UTC) | *'''Redirect''' to ], along with four or five others who are in the same boat (i.e. did not place in the Miss Universe contest). ] (]) 10:59, 9 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Procedural keep''' is a good description. This slew of nominations looks like an attack on this traditional claim to notability. The amount of coverage every one of these contestants get, at what is essentially a media event, certainly meets GNG. I found the LA Times, Seattle P/I and Las Vegas Sun does an individual article on each contestant, much less the celebrity and fashion magazines that do coverage on each contestant. And to show the ] bad faith nomination of this particular contestant, there is an article I sourced in Time Magazine of her modeling a controversial national costume, apparently missed because the OP didn't bother to look. I think all of these noms should be '''Keep''' wholesale with the same disregard the OP used in making the noms. ] (]) 18:21, 9 September 2014 (UTC) | *'''Procedural keep''' is a good description. This slew of nominations looks like an attack on this traditional claim to notability. The amount of coverage every one of these contestants get, at what is essentially a media event, certainly meets GNG. I found the LA Times, Seattle P/I and Las Vegas Sun does an individual article on each contestant, much less the celebrity and fashion magazines that do coverage on each contestant. And to show the ] bad faith nomination of this particular contestant, there is an article I sourced in Time Magazine of her modeling a controversial national costume, apparently missed because the OP didn't bother to look. I think all of these noms should be '''Keep''' wholesale with the same disregard the OP used in making the noms. ] (]) 18:21, 9 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :*FYI: ] <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">] ]</span> 20:12, 9 September 2014 (UTC) | :*FYI: ]. And instead of throwing with PAs, you better start reading what I wrote before. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">] ]</span> 20:12, 9 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:18, 9 September 2014
Marcelina Vahekeni
- Marcelina Vahekeni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG. No independent sources for this BLP The Banner talk 12:07, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - No evidence of any notability, Only crap I've found are all FB/Twitter related. –Davey2010 • (talk) 14:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Procedural keep - Represented her country at the indisputably notable Miss Universe. That is usually sufficient for a stub article. Mabalu (talk) 09:57, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- A simple Google Test gives a number of less than 15 thousands hits, including doubles, related and social media. That boiled down to a massive 250 unique hits. The Banner talk 10:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 10:04, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to Miss Angola, along with four or five others who are in the same boat (i.e. did not place in the Miss Universe contest). Clarityfiend (talk) 10:59, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Procedural keep is a good description. This slew of nominations looks like an attack on this traditional claim to notability. The amount of coverage every one of these contestants get, at what is essentially a media event, certainly meets GNG. I found the LA Times, Seattle P/I and Las Vegas Sun does an individual article on each contestant, much less the celebrity and fashion magazines that do coverage on each contestant. And to show the WP:BEFORE bad faith nomination of this particular contestant, there is an article I sourced in Time Magazine of her modeling a controversial national costume, apparently missed because the OP didn't bother to look. I think all of these noms should be Keep wholesale with the same disregard the OP used in making the noms. Trackinfo (talk) 18:21, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- FYI: Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrdhimas. And instead of throwing with PAs, you better start reading what I wrote before. The Banner talk 20:12, 9 September 2014 (UTC)