Misplaced Pages

User talk:Chuck Marean/Archive01: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Chuck Marean Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:35, 7 July 2006 editChuck Marean (talk | contribs)3,882 edits response← Previous edit Revision as of 01:52, 8 July 2006 edit undoChuck Marean (talk | contribs)3,882 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
] {{User USA}}]





{{User USA}}


A few accounts have stated, I think, something about wanting to participate in my edits. They stated as angry accusations that I have done edits all by myself, despite the Introduction and Tutorial encouraging me to do so. Their critical tone hid what they were saying, if anything. However, I'm perfectly willing to use the help me box more often. If you write a message, please consider the possibility that you're wrong and be as calm & polite as possible.
----

== Personal attacks == == Personal attacks ==



Revision as of 01:52, 8 July 2006

This user lives in the
United States of America.

Archived talk



A few accounts have stated, I think, something about wanting to participate in my edits. They stated as angry accusations that I have done edits all by myself, despite the Introduction and Tutorial encouraging me to do so. Their critical tone hid what they were saying, if anything. However, I'm perfectly willing to use the help me box more often. If you write a message, please consider the possibility that you're wrong and be as calm & polite as possible.


Personal attacks

Chuck, please stop adding the "personal attack" tag when there are no personal attacks. Please refer to the this page - you should not refactor comments on your actions - respond to them instead. --mtz206 (talk) 22:53, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

It says "Personal attacks are the parts of a comment which can be considered personally offensive and which have no relevant factual content." In my opinion, all of the comments were personal attacks which had almost no factual content. --Chuck Marean 23:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)