| Revision as of 05:14, 9 July 2006 editBaumfabrik (talk | contribs)459 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:44, 9 July 2006 edit undoTobias Conradi (talk | contribs)37,615 edits →[]: move my comment upwards. should refer to coredesatNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. ] ('']'') 14:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom. ] ('']'') 14:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. This probably should not have been kept based on the previous VfD. Fails ] and ]. --''']]]''' <small>]</small> 03:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. This probably should not have been kept based on the previous VfD. Fails ] and ]. --''']]]''' <small>]</small> 03:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ** comment ] ''Don't make a new article for your own product or Web site. Most often, when a person creates a new article describing his or her own work, '''it's because the work is not yet notable enough to have attracted anyone else's attention.''' Articles of this sort are known as vanity pages and are usually deleted. Misplaced Pages does indeed have articles about popular products and Web sites, but it is not acceptable to use Misplaced Pages to popularize them.'' - '''a page with 4000 visits a day certainly attracts attention already.''' ] ] 04:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | *'''Delete''' - vanity, website run by article author, completely non-notable. ] | ] 04:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | **] ''Don't make a new article for your own product or Web site. Most often, when a person creates a new article describing his or her own work, '''it's because the work is not yet notable enough to have attracted anyone else's attention.''' Articles of this sort are known as vanity pages and are usually deleted. Misplaced Pages does indeed have articles about popular products and Web sites, but it is not acceptable to use Misplaced Pages to popularize them.'' - '''a page with 4000 visits a day certainly attracts attention already.''' ] ] 04:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::I'm slightly confused here, Tobias; are you voting for the deletion of the article that you created which refers to your own website? --] 05:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | ::I'm slightly confused here, Tobias; are you voting for the deletion of the article that you created which refers to your own website? --] 05:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | *'''Delete''' - vanity, website run by article author, completely non-notable. ] | ] 04:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:44, 9 July 2006
Tango.info
Hmm, this article survived VfD last year, but I think this article should be wiped per WP:WEB and WP:SPAM, and for reminding me of that big fat bald orange bloke. die Baumfabrik 09:28, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri @ 09:49, July 8, 2006
- Delete per nom. Emc² (CONTACT ME) 14:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This probably should not have been kept based on the previous VfD. Fails WP:WEB and WP:SPAM. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- comment WP:SPAM#How_not_to_be_a_spammer Don't make a new article for your own product or Web site. Most often, when a person creates a new article describing his or her own work, it's because the work is not yet notable enough to have attracted anyone else's attention. Articles of this sort are known as vanity pages and are usually deleted. Misplaced Pages does indeed have articles about popular products and Web sites, but it is not acceptable to use Misplaced Pages to popularize them. - a page with 4000 visits a day certainly attracts attention already. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 04:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm slightly confused here, Tobias; are you voting for the deletion of the article that you created which refers to your own website? --die Baumfabrik 05:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - vanity, website run by article author, completely non-notable. pschemp | talk 04:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)