Misplaced Pages

talk:Arbitration Committee: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:54, 11 October 2014 editTony1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors276,461 edits →2014 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission← Previous edit Revision as of 09:55, 11 October 2014 edit undoThe ed17 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators73,726 edits →The saga of arbitration enforcement: ceNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:
*] *]
*]/] (note: this administrator was formerly known as {{u|Bwilkins}} and has a checkered history with blocking editors) *]/] (note: this administrator was formerly known as {{u|Bwilkins}} and has a checkered history with blocking editors)
*]: upon expanding this, you'll note that Dangerous Panda blocked for comments Lecen made in error (wrong page; he was, I assume, planning to go to ] with them instead) and removed as soon as he realized the mistake. This removal was hours before Dangerous Panda implemented the block, therefore making this into a punitive block. I assume all of the arbitrators are aware that we don't do punitive blocks for ]. ]&nbsp;<sup>]]&nbsp;]]</sup> 09:40, 11 October 2014 (UTC) *]: upon expanding this, you'll note that Dangerous Panda blocked Lecen for comments he made in error (they were on wrong page; he was, I assume, planning to go to ] instead). Lecen removed them as soon as he realized the mistake, hours before Dangerous Panda implemented the block. This was a punitive block, and we don't hand those out for ]. ]&nbsp;<sup>]]&nbsp;]]</sup> 09:40, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:55, 11 October 2014

Use this page to discuss information on the page (and subpages) attached to this one. This includes limited discussion of the Arbitration Committee itself, as a body. Some things belong on other pages:
  • requesting arbitration: WP:A/R
  • discussing finalised decisions of the committee: WT:ACN
  • discussing pending decisions: find the proceedings page at Template:Casenav
  • discussing the process of arbitration: WT:A/R
Shortcuts
Media mentionThis Arbitration Committee has been mentioned by a media organization:
Misplaced Pages Arbitration
Open proceedings
Active sanctions
Arbitration Committee
Audit
Track related changes
Archiving icon
WT:AC Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

2014 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission

The RfC to appoint 3 individuals to the 2014 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission has begun. Nominations will be accepted through October 17 23:59 (UTC). Following the nomination period, comments will be welcomed to discuss the suitability of the candidates.

Best regards, Mike V • Talk 04:00, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

I thought Arbcom elections were meant to be managed entirely by the community. What is this notice doing here? Tony (talk) 09:54, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

The saga of arbitration enforcement

How is it that an administrator can make a demonstrably poor block at WP:AE and disappear, forcing the 'defendant' to wade through an overly bureaucratic appeals process? (Dangerous Panda has not responded to an email sent by Lecen) Relevant links:

Category: