| Revision as of 10:48, 18 October 2014 editAmortias (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators33,899 editsm Reverted edits by N8+-98 (talk) to last version by Beeblebrox← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:26, 18 October 2014 edit undoSaadkhan12345 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,929 edits →A cup of tea for you!: new WikiLove messageTag: WikiLoveNext edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| Hi ], I think that the article you edited ] may be not referenced, but it's notable. Please mark the subject as reviewed and let me work in it. You are open to help too! Have a great day. <b>]</b> <small>]</small> 01:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | Hi ], I think that the article you edited ] may be not referenced, but it's notable. Please mark the subject as reviewed and let me work in it. You are open to help too! Have a great day. <b>]</b> <small>]</small> 01:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::All ] '''must''' have appropriate references to ]. That is why we have the ] process, which I used to nominate it. All you have to do is find one single reliable source to attach to it. If that can't be found within the next week it will be deleted. I'm afraid this is one of the firmer rules around here, both for the integrity of the project and the protection of article subjects. I did do a quick search myself and came up empty. As someone with more of an interest in the subject you may have more luck with more specialized searches. Good luck. ] (]) 02:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | ::All ] '''must''' have appropriate references to ]. That is why we have the ] process, which I used to nominate it. All you have to do is find one single reliable source to attach to it. If that can't be found within the next week it will be deleted. I'm afraid this is one of the firmer rules around here, both for the integrity of the project and the protection of article subjects. I did do a quick search myself and came up empty. As someone with more of an interest in the subject you may have more luck with more specialized searches. Good luck. ] (]) 02:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == A cup of tea for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Looks its been over 4 days...first day & first edit 14 October, 2014...second 15 October...third 16 October and fourth October 17. and today 18 october. can you please looks into this ] (]) 11:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
Revision as of 11:26, 18 October 2014
Welcome to my talk page
I prefer to keep conversations in one place in order to make it easier to follow them. Therefore, if I have begun a conversation with you elsewhere, that is where I would prefer you reply and is probably where I will reply to you.
If you have a question or comment about an arbitration matter it would probably be better to post it at the relevant case page or the ArbCom noticeboard unless it is specifically about my own actions.
I am an oversighter, but I will not be very active in that capacity during my term on the Arbitration Committee. If you need to request oversight, following the process at WP:RFO is the best route to getting your request handled in a timely fashion.
Do you actually want to be blocked? I'll consider your request iff you meet my criteria, Click here to see them.
Caribou / Reindeer merge
I see that you may not see this for some time, but I'll leave a comment anyway. Since you were the one who proposed the merge (and I agree it should be done), wouldn't it make more sense to merge back to the main Reindeer article, rather than the other direction? Quite a bit of the content in the Caribou article (a solo project) was literally "stolen" (I AGF that it wasn't done maliciously), without attribution, from the Reindeer article anyway. I have restored that deleted content to the reindeer article, without doing anything with the caribou article. The main Reindeer article should be able to cover the entire Rangifer tarandus subject, while still allowing some subarticles for specific subspecies. -- Brangifer (talk) 05:11, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- BTW, the ultimate title (Caribou vs Reindeer) isn't a big issue with me. It's the content that counts. I think one main article for rangifer tarandus should cover the subject, regardless of which title we choose. -- Brangifer (talk) 07:56, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Asscrack
I regret having made such a fuss over it. I know you were just trying to stop a fiasco from happening. Please accept my apologies. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:44, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Template:Editnotices/Page/New Year's Eve (film)
Hi Beeblebrox. I believe this editnotice (which you created) is no longer required (it expired on 1 March 2013 and the film was released in 2011). If you agree, are you happy to delete it? Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 00:38, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Done. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:13, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 05:05, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Cash L3wis
Hi Beeblebrox, I think that the article you edited Cash L3wis may be not referenced, but it's notable. Please mark the subject as reviewed and let me work in it. You are open to help too! Have a great day. Karlhard 01:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- All biographies of living persons must have appropriate references to reliable sources. That is why we have the WP:BLPPROD process, which I used to nominate it. All you have to do is find one single reliable source to attach to it. If that can't be found within the next week it will be deleted. I'm afraid this is one of the firmer rules around here, both for the integrity of the project and the protection of article subjects. I did do a quick search myself and came up empty. As someone with more of an interest in the subject you may have more luck with more specialized searches. Good luck. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
|
Looks its been over 4 days...first day & first edit 14 October, 2014...second 15 October...third 16 October and fourth October 17. and today 18 october. can you please looks into this Saadkhan12345 (talk) 11:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC) |