| Revision as of 17:19, 10 July 2006 editPgk (talk | contribs)20,534 editsm Reverted edits by Chuck Marean (talk) to last version by Crzrussian← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:22, 10 July 2006 edit undoPgk (talk | contribs)20,534 edits →24 hr blockNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| ::Blank it once more, and I will protect it. - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 15:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | ::Blank it once more, and I will protect it. - <b>]</b><small> ]/]</small> 15:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| {{ |
{{Unblock reviewed|Harassment by User:Crzrussian,User:Avogadro94, User:Mtz206, & Misplaced Pages:Blocking policy|This looks like one of those silly situations which has got way beyond what it should be, I suggest you use the block period to cool off a little.}} | ||
| --] 15:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | --] 15:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:22, 10 July 2006
 | This user lives in the United States of America. |
Welcome. If you're leaving a "direction", explain why the idea itself is good, and be polite. Remember whoever you are, I don't know if you know what you're talking about.
Deleting talk page
Chuck, as has been pointed out to you before , deleting warnings and relevant discussions from your talk page without archiving is generally frowned upon. Having access to previous discussions benefits yourself as well as other editors, especially when the discussions are good faith efforts to help you better understand policy and make contributions to our encyclopedia. Here are links to three large chunks of your talk page that you have removed: , , . If you like, I can help you with making a proper archive. --mtz206 (talk) 11:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Chuck, it is too bad that you think that my comments were threatening. I was following convention regarding users blanking warnings on your own user page by placing a very innocuous template ({{Wr}}) on your user page and restoring the warnings. I am happy to defer to mtz206's decision regarding the restoration of the warnings. Regardless, the warnings were put there to inform you of the need to cooperate with the community, as it has attempted to cooperate with you. --Avogadro 13:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
24 hr block
For Legal threats and removing warnings from your user talk page.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - CrazyRougeian talk/email 14:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --mtz206 (talk) 15:16, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Blank it once more, and I will protect it. - CrazyRougeian talk/email 15:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Chuck Marean (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Harassment by User:Crzrussian,User:Avogadro94, User:Mtz206, & Misplaced Pages:Blocking policy
Decline reason:
This looks like one of those silly situations which has got way beyond what it should be, I suggest you use the block period to cool off a little.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.