Misplaced Pages

Lumber Cartel: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:58, 10 July 2006 editCrossmr (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers18,925 edits Revert to revision 62781991 dated 2006-07-08 21:57:10 by Crossmr using popups← Previous edit Revision as of 19:59, 10 July 2006 edit undoDragonflySixtyseven (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators88,079 editsm Reverted edits by Crossmr (talk) to last version by DragonflySixtysevenNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Lumber Cartel''' was a ], first promulgated either by ] himself, or by one of his employees, and subsequently popularized on ], that was alleged to back ]mers.
<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled -->{{#if:{{{nosubst|}}}|<div style="display:none;">}} {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|| |{{error:not substituted|AFD}}<div style="display:none;">}}{{#if:{{{nosubst|}}}|</div></div>}}
<div class="boilerplate metadata" id="afd" style="margin: 0 5%; padding: 0 7px 7px 7px; background: #EDF1F1; border: 1px solid #999999; text-align: left; font-size:95%;">
'''This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Misplaced Pages's ]]'''<br />
Please share your thoughts on the matter at ''']''' on the Articles for deletion page.<br />
Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the article during the discussion, read the ].<br/>
''<small>Steps to ]: {{tls|afd}} <nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:afd2|pg={{PAGENAME}}|text=}} <nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:afd3|pg={{PAGENAME}}}} </small></div>
{{{category|]}}}
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->
{{OR}}
The '''Lumber Cartel''' was a supposed ] that backed ]mers.


In November of 1997, a participant on ] discovered an essay on Wallace's corporate website, and to the newsgroup. The essay described a ]:
Somewhere around late 1997, some ] ]s and people who sympathized with them started to develop a ], which was later brought to the attention of anti-spammers in ]. According to them, the anti-spam efforts were funded by several major ] companies. The logic in that is that these companies first destroy the forests, and make ] out of them, which is then in turn used to send ]. Since sending ] is less costly and doesn't use paper at all, the lumber companies obviously wanted to stop it before it would surpass paper-based bulk mailing, which, according to conspiracy theorists, was already considerably cutting into their profits. Spammers in general tended to say that one of the great things about spam was that it was more ecologically sound, and that they were doing their part to protect the environment.

{{cquote|The original anti-spammer was in truth a major spammer just one day before two major lumber companies deposited a total of $275,000 into his account. He instantly stopped spamming and began what is now the biggest anti-spam ring on the Internet.}}

The reasoning was that these companies first destroy forests and make ] out of them, which is in turn used to send ]. Since sending ] doesn't use paper at all, the essay argued, the lumber companies would want to stop it before it would surpass paper-based bulk mailing, and consequently only those in the pay of the lumber companies would be anti-spam.


Anti-spammers, of course, were quick to point out that this reasoning is far from the truth. There are many reasons why e-mail spam was, and continues to be, a threat to the Internet, and why people continue to fight spam either in their spare time or professionally. In addition, in recent decades only ] ] (which is used to print ]) is being made out of ] (which is, also, very far from ]), other fine papers (like the kind used to print glossy advertisements and brochures) are made out of cotton rags. It is thus unlikely that the any lumber or tree-harvesting industry would benefit from any change from junk mailing. Furthermore, lumber companies themselves have little to do with paper companies, and bulk mail constitutes only a small part of total paper use. Anti-spammers, of course, were quick to point out that this reasoning is far from the truth. There are many reasons why e-mail spam was, and continues to be, a threat to the Internet, and why people continue to fight spam either in their spare time or professionally. In addition, in recent decades only ] ] (which is used to print ]) is being made out of ] (which is, also, very far from ]), other fine papers (like the kind used to print glossy advertisements and brochures) are made out of cotton rags. It is thus unlikely that the any lumber or tree-harvesting industry would benefit from any change from junk mailing. Furthermore, lumber companies themselves have little to do with paper companies, and bulk mail constitutes only a small part of total paper use.


Anti-spammers started to ridicule the spammers for coming up with this conspiracy, and even formed a group of their own known as "The Lumber Cartel." Resultingly, many anti-spammers proudly proclaimed in their e-mail and Usenet ]s, that they were members of The Lumber Cartel, a statement which was immediately followed by the acronym "TINLC" (There Is No Lumber Cartel), reminiscent of the ] catchphrase. Gatherings of anti-spammers on Usenet began to ridicule proponents of this theory, and many participants in ] chose to dub themselves as members of "the Lumber Cartel" in their ]s, followed immediately by the acronymic disclaimer "TINLC" (There Is No Lumber Cartel), reminiscent of the ] catchphrase.


==References and external links== ==References and external links==
* *
* "" () - article posted by "Vladimir" to news.admin.net-abuse.email in 1997-11-14 * "" () - article posted by "Vladimir" to news.admin.net-abuse.email on 1997-11-14
* Web site of "The Lumber Cartel"; available through The Internet Archive. * Web site of "The Lumber Cartel"; available through The Internet Archive.
* The ]: "" * The ]: ""
*] in ]'s ] *] in ]'s ]
* *


===Web sites dedicated to the Lumber Cartel=== ===Web sites dedicated to the Lumber Cartel===
Line 32: Line 27:
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

Revision as of 19:59, 10 July 2006

The Lumber Cartel was a conspiracy theory, first promulgated either by Sanford Wallace himself, or by one of his employees, and subsequently popularized on USENET, that was alleged to back anti-spammers.

In November of 1997, a participant on news.admin.net-abuse.email discovered an essay on Wallace's corporate website, and posted its contents to the newsgroup. The essay described a conspiracy theory:

The original anti-spammer was in truth a major spammer just one day before two major lumber companies deposited a total of $275,000 into his account. He instantly stopped spamming and began what is now the biggest anti-spam ring on the Internet.

The reasoning was that these companies first destroy forests and make paper out of them, which is in turn used to send bulk mail. Since sending e-mail spam doesn't use paper at all, the essay argued, the lumber companies would want to stop it before it would surpass paper-based bulk mailing, and consequently only those in the pay of the lumber companies would be anti-spam.

Anti-spammers, of course, were quick to point out that this reasoning is far from the truth. There are many reasons why e-mail spam was, and continues to be, a threat to the Internet, and why people continue to fight spam either in their spare time or professionally. In addition, in recent decades only newsprint paper (which is used to print newspapers) is being made out of pulpwood (which is, also, very far from lumber), other fine papers (like the kind used to print glossy advertisements and brochures) are made out of cotton rags. It is thus unlikely that the any lumber or tree-harvesting industry would benefit from any change from junk mailing. Furthermore, lumber companies themselves have little to do with paper companies, and bulk mail constitutes only a small part of total paper use.

Gatherings of anti-spammers on Usenet began to ridicule proponents of this theory, and many participants in news.admin.net-abuse.email chose to dub themselves as members of "the Lumber Cartel" in their signatures, followed immediately by the acronymic disclaimer "TINLC" (There Is No Lumber Cartel), reminiscent of the There Is No Cabal catchphrase.

References and external links

Web sites dedicated to the Lumber Cartel

Categories: