Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 01:17, 31 October 2014

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

User:108.250.160.174 reported by User:Gaijin42 (Result: Semi)

Page

Shooting of Michael Brown (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

108.250.160.174 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 18:04, 28 October 2014 (UTC) "/* County autopsy */"
2. 17:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC) "/* County autopsy */"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 17:57, 28 October 2014 (UTC) "General note: Adding unreferenced controversial information about living persons. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 00:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC) "/* Independent Autopsy */ other scenarios"
2. 02:31, 28 October 2014 (UTC) "/* Independent Autopsy */ how is this synth?"
3. 12:37, 28 October 2014 (UTC) "/* Criticism of Brown Family Autopsy by Baden and Parcell */R"
4. 13:02, 28 October 2014 (UTC) "/* Criticism of Brown Family Autopsy by Baden and Parcell */ add ping and link"

Comments:

New IP repeatedly adding info cited to personal blog in violation of WP:SELFPUB and WP:SPSBLP. Content in question has been under discussion for a day+ now, but IP has not participated (or indeed ever edited before today)

They are technically only at 2RR now, but as this is BLP violating, and I would go to 3RR by reverting them again, I am reporting. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:08, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

• Result: Semiprotected one month. Reverting by IPs who do not wait to get consensus on the talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 20:28, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

The problem was one IP, as stated. Other IPs have recently made uncontroversial edits or at least given up after being reverted once. Even the problem IP gave up 26 hours before the protection was applied. ‑‑Mandruss ☎ 20:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Szaboci and User:Yatzhek reported by User:106.185.47.4 (Result: )

Page: Eastern Europe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Users being reported: Szaboci (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Yatzhek (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Yatzhek's addition to the article isn't necessary in my opinion, but technically the one who broke 3RR rule is User:Szaboci (4 reverts in less than 24h - the 1st one at 18:36, 27 October 2014‎ and the 4th one at 17:09, 28 October 2014‎). At the moment of this report User:Yatzhek has a total of 3 reverts (I've also counted 2 reverts made by the IPs 195.69.81.75 and 78.9.132.188 which most probably also belong to him) 106.185.47.4 (talk) 22:09, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

• Note. At this juncture I've alerted both reported users to WP:ARBEE. Yatzhek should, of course, not be blocked for edit warring. Although the filer is correct that Szaboci breached 3RR, they weren't warned of the potential breach. That said, I think it would be constructive for Szaboci to comment here.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:05, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Apologies, this won't happen again. Szaboci (talk) 13:46, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

User:188.230.168.195 reported by User:Darkness Shines (Result: Semi-protected)

Page

Volga Tatars (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

188.230.168.195 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 23:48, 28 October 2014 (UTC) "In infobox there are supposed to be notable Volga Tatars. Halfies are not the best representatives of Volga Tatar phenotype. Plus Shaimiev and Mukhametshin are much more notable than Mustafina and Shayk."
2. 22:53, 28 October 2014 (UTC) "For the forth time, if you think they are so famous put them in infobox in article about Russian people."
3. 22:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 631384735 by KazekageTR (talk)For the third time, if you think they are so famous put them in infobox on article about Russian people"
4. 22:04, 27 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 631375592 by KazekageTR (talk) For the second time, if you think they are so famous put them in infobox on article about Russian people"
5. 15:18, 27 October 2014 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 23:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Volga Tatars. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

• Page protected (semi) for one month. The IP is the same person (multiple IPs) that caused me to protect the article for a week on October 15.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:12, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Adamstom.97 & User:TriiipleThreat reported by User:Rm w a vu (Result:Filer blocked 36 hours )

Page: List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Adamstom.97 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) & TriiipleThreat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_Marvel_Cinematic_Universe_films&diff=631556662&oldid=631556459

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_Marvel_Cinematic_Universe_films&diff=631556662&oldid=631556459

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AList_of_Marvel_Cinematic_Universe_films&diff=631572015&oldid=631551745

Comments: Despite my attempts to initiate and engage in a sensible discussion determining my grounds for the inclusion of a table in the article, two users removed the table without regard and with pithy dismissal for my reasoning, and clearly no intention to seek consensus. --rm 'w avu 05:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Comment: I reverted twice, once when I came upon what appeared to be vandalism, and again to inform the above user that a discussion should take place prior to the addition of such material. They continued to re-add the information, without attempting to discuss the issue first, taking their personal opinion as superior to the consensus of two other editors, as can be seen at the articles talk page, Talk:List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films. I have no interest in edit wars or long debates, and am open to leaving the contentious material on the page if the user is willing to discuss its inclusion with myself and the other regular MCU editors. - adamstom97 (talk) 09:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Comment: I only reverted twice as well, whereas Rm w a vu (talk · contribs) has reverted a total of four times (see below). Though he did initiate discussion, he re-reverted before anyone had a chance to respond and has since continually reverted to his preferred version of the page. After my initial revert of his bold change, he should have began discussion and made no further reverts until consensus could be reached. Sadly, this was not the case. It should be noted that I have no further edits to article after my second revert, nor will I until the dispute is settled.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 10:18, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

• Filer Blocked – for a period of 36 hours (see also report below). What's clear here is that Rm w a vu performed a bold edit. It was not accepted by the community - for whatever reason, and thus WP:CONSENSUS was against the edit at the time. If you make an edit and it's reverted, you have ZERO authority to re-implement the edit no matter what until you have discussed the edit, and achieved new consensus. In many cases, you will NOT gain consensus, which means your edit may not be made. Simply starting the consensus discussion does not permit you to re-add, ever. Although WP:BRD is an essay, it's the simplest method of understanding the responsibilities of the person who wishes to make a bold edit. The fact that not only did Rm w a vu make the edit, re-make the edit, then continued to revert back to their preferred version while a consensus discussion took place (the exact opposite of the process), they took it upon themselves to file this AN/3RR report against the editors who clearly understood the WP:BRD process has led to a 36 hour block. the panda ₯’ 10:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Rm w a vu reported by User:TriiipleThreat (Result:Blocked 36 hours )

Page: List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Rm w a vu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments: Despite multiple attempts from different editors to bring awareness of WP:BRD, Rm w a vu (talk · contribs) has continually reverted the page to his preferred version. Rm w a vu made the initial bold change to article which was subsequently reverted. At this time, he did begin a discussion on the articles talk page but re-reverted the revert before anyone had a chance to respond. Rm w a vu went on to make 3 more re-reverts while discussion was taking place.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 10:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 36 hours - see more comments in filing above the panda ₯’ 10:47, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Alzira Peirce article; editwarring and 3RR violations by User:Margerypark

Apparent newbie, single purpose editor has engaged in edit warring and violating 3RR. I welcomed her (?), offered to work collegially if she would only specify what I got wrong in the article. I specifically warned her that she would be violating 3RR which would likely incur a block if she reverted my edits again. She has made no response, nor even acknowledged reading anything in the welcome or which I personally wrote on her talk page. I don't even know if she has read anything on her talk page. Please delete her last revert, impose block for violating 3RR despite specific warning and if possible protect the page for 48 hours. Edit warring ANI notice left. Please see and . Thanks, Quis separabit? 19:17, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

:: Why is this being ignored?? I mean you just skip over to a newer issue?? This is ridiculous and not the first time it's happened. Quis separabit? 21:15, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Its not a case of being ignored more of a case of an administrative shortage. Its only been here 2 hours and you can request page protection seperatley at WP:RFPP. The turn around there is normally better than the response here for that sort of request. Amortias (T)(C) 21:20, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Apologies, I mistakenly thought newer entries had been handled out of sequence. Quis separabit? 21:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

• Note. The reported editor has not breached 3RR (she's made three reverts), and she made her last revert only a few minutes after your warning, so it's possible she did not see it. And you, Rms125a@hotmail.com, really need to follow the instructions on this page when filing a report.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:23, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

I reviewed the instructions and I don't see what I did wrong. Your punt on this issue ensures that Margerypark's outrageous conduct -- i.e. erasing text with barely an explanation, refusal to respond to messages on her talk page, refuse to engage civilly or collegially, etc. -- will continue. Quis separabit? 00:37, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

I'm frankly astounded. Why don't you answer a modified Passover question: why is your report different from all other reports? I should have just closed it as Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:33, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I will check it out. I hardly ever report people for 3RR so I guess I didn't know. Does this mean I should make the same report that I just made over again? But it's not really 3RR, it's 4RR, so I don't have a case. I am going to have to wait for her to violate 3RR (really 4RR) again to file a new report, I guess, if she does. Anyway you declined not because of technical reasons (malformation) but substantive ones. So thanks anyway, Yours, Quis separabit? 02:14, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Adjutor101 reported by User:Dougweller (Result: Blocked)

Page

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Adjutor101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 18:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 631633777 by DMacks (talk) Dear DMacks I have responded to the reservations on the talk page. Misplaced Pages is place were all arguments/view-points are to be represented."
2. 16:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 631605986 by Bladesmulti (talk) Bladesmulti these are citiations from books by you can go check their isbns out or their publishing houses. The books are by Islamic scholars"
3. 05:56, 28 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 631421841 by Bladesmulti (talk) aliislam.org is the Ahmadi official website, remove references 2, 7, 24, 30, 35, 37, 40, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55,69, 74, 80 are all from this websit"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Editor was blocked for 72 hours for edit-warring which was extended to a week for block evasion. The block expired 01:04, 28 October 2014 and he has returned to editwar. He's been reverted by 5 editors including me. Dougweller (talk) 19:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

And despite the notification of this discussion, he's again reverted.19:43, 29 October 2014‎ Adjutor101 (talk | contribs | block)‎ . . (60,860 bytes) (+2,936)‎ . . (Undid revision 631651680 by Dougweller (talk) If information is properly sourced: Dougweller (talk) 21:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of one month.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Soffredo reported by User:RGloucester (Result: Blocked)

Page

Republic of Ilirida (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Soffredo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 01:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 631543256 by Local hero (talk) There's no reason to remove the useful infobox showing a map of the republic. Also, the Albanian insurgency of 2001 is relevant."
2. 23:08, 28 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 629706712 by Local hero (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

User was placed on strict WP:1RR per this discussion. This is a clear violation of that restriction. He has already been blocked for breaking said restriction once before. RGloucester — ☎ 21:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of one month.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Omio Asad reported by User:Kailash29792 (Result: 48 hours )

Page

Deepika Padukone (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Omio Asad (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 08:13, 30 October 2014 (UTC) ""
2. 08:20, 30 October 2014 (UTC) ""
3. 08:28, 30 October 2014 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Continuously tries to add an infobox to the featured article, albeit without full success - in spite of the article containing a note advising not to add the same. Moreover, the article passed its FAC without an infobox. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Blocked. I've blocked the account for 48 hours for multiple issues including edit-warring and BLP concerns.--Jezebel's Ponyo 17:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

User:46.218.48.167 reported by User:Hchc2009 (Result: Semi)

Page: Middle Ages (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 46.218.48.167 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Hchc2009 (talk) 16:35, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: Semiprotected one month. EdJohnston (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Margerypark reported by User:Rms125a@hotmail.com (Result: )

Page: Alzira Peirce (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Margerypark (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments: This user simply reverts my edits, without stating what is wrong, replacing my version with a resume-style, non MOS-conforming, highly inferior version (of her own). I reported this yesterday, however for both technical and subtantive reasons my report was rejected.

Now, however, she has violated WP:3RR by making FIVE reverts within the last 24 hours, despite my clear warning on her talk page to her, which I have no idea if she has even read. The warning was good will on my part as I presumed she is a newbie editor and I didn't want to bite her. She may not be a newbie, who knows? I have gone out of my way to be civil and collegial to Margerypark on her talkpage, asking, imploring her to work with me. She has never responded there or anywhere else, and I have no reason to think she even reads what is on her talk page. This apparent newbie editor believes she owns the article and possibly has some COI connection.

• NOTE: page may need protection. I know that's another ANI dept but since I am here already. Yours, Quis separabit? 19:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
• Just to clarify: I did not know another editor would be making an editwarring/3RR complaint about Margerypark, a few minutes after my own. I am leaving my own version, complementary to his, as it contains certain info which is not present in his, understandably as I am the one who initiated contact with Margerypark. The only reason my signature stamp reveals a later time, indicating that I filed this report after he did is because I worked piecemeal since I am on a library database/catalog computer (Misplaced Pages is accessible as part of the database) and there is no notepad accessory or even Microsoft Word access, so I made more than one trip here now, and re-signed,thus producing an apparently later time stamp, which, if true, would mean I had broken the sequence, which I would not do. Quis separabit? 20:06, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Margerypark reported by User:Amortias (Result: )

Page

Alzira Peirce (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Margerypark (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. Consecutive edits made from 15:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC) to 15:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
   1. 15:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC) "Corrected numerous inaccurate amendments made to article."
   2. 15:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC) ""
2. 18:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision by Rms125a@hotmail.com which deleted accurate sourced info with inaccuracies, notably identifying Alzira's grandfather as her father."
3. 18:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 631642695 by Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk)"
4. 19:17, 30 October 2014 (UTC) ""
5. 19:21, 30 October 2014 (UTC) "As apparent from previous controversies Rms125a@hotmal.com appears to be a compulsive Misplaced Pages vandal."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

User has been warned by another user (diff to follow) though not 3RR definetly edit warring and is so close to the revert rule is quite possibly gaming the system. Amortias (T)(C) 19:27, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Ryulong reported by User:Tutelary (Result: )

Page

Gamergate controversy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Ryulong (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 01:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 631828821 by PseudoSomething (talk) that's not what's happening; BLP does not protect the people not mentioned on Misplaced Pages in the sources cited"
2. 00:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC) "per the discussions on WT:BLP and WP:BLPN, there's no violation & similarly weakly sourced statements regarding the syringe are being allowed so there's no problem with this"
3. 22:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 631807580 by Masem (talk) they point out that the site is used by others but accuse Gamergate of mirroring their whole website so this is relevant"
4. 19:39, 30 October 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 631791747 by Tutelary (talk) Buzzfeed's staff member articles are reliable sources."
5. 19:35, 30 October 2014 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by Tutelary (talk): WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:NOR all support this statement. (TW)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 19:09, 30 October 2014 (UTC) "/* KotakuInAction moderators misogynist/anti-feminist/interested in female subjugation porn */ c"
2. 19:12, 30 October 2014 (UTC) "/* KotakuInAction moderators misogynist/anti-feminist/interested in female subjugation porn */ r"
3. 19:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC) "/* KotakuInAction moderators misogynist/anti-feminist/interested in female subjugation porn */ r"
4. 19:49, 30 October 2014 (UTC) "/* KotakuInAction moderators misogynist/anti-feminist/interested in female subjugation porn */ r"

Comments:

Does 3RR mean anything if Ryulong can just break it whenever he wants to? If you're not sure what I mean, this is the second time I am reporting him and last time, I reported him for 15RR (in the most recent archive) and nothing happened. I'm getting seriously annoyed that this editor is able to break it without any serious consequences. Does having 212k edits and being here for 8 years grant him exempt from the rules and policies of edit warring? I don't think so, that's why I'm filing this report. Regarding the no warning, it's already been established that Ryulong is aware that he is over 3RR in the last report and that he doesn't appear to acknowledge the fact that he should stop breaking it. If this isn't remedied here, I don't know what I will do. Tutelary (talk) 01:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring