Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hi Sawtooth....you have reverted one of my edits ] ...(involving cia and u.s) which i think is wrong ... Operation zarb-e-azb is PART of the ongoing U.S. War on Terror. It would be nice of you if you read the article .. ] ....anyways thanks ] (]) 06:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
|}
Revision as of 06:19, 4 November 2014
Welcome!
Hello, TheSawTooth! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Misplaced Pages, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Faizan17:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I reverted your sweeping change to this article for a number of reasons, here are a few:
Blog posts are not suitable sources
Press releases are not suitable sources
An article about a company which recycles does not need descriptions of what recycling is or general concepts of recycling - that information is provided via wikilinks
Despite your edit to the talk page you clearly don't have a NPOV, expanding everything but the controversy section greatly and editing only this one topic is not 'neutral'
You synthesised refs discussing recycling in general with the ERAs mission statement
Including needlessly detailed information in contravention of the general manual of style
And so on. I think you should probably avoid editing in this area which you appear to have a close connection with until you're more familiar with Wikipedias rules and guidelines. Cheers, Nikthestunned09:36, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
I move to dispute your disruption of my fresh attempt to rewrite. I have no connection with this company whatsoever. I have not used any unnecessary positive language for subject or weasel words as you say. Also I move to dispute your claim of sources I have taken from news papers. I request you to read that I have also expanded controversy section much by verifying sources and I here by request you to read the source that is referred as my conclusion is written after reading that. Have you read it or are you just disputing without doing that? I removed one blog source. I advise you not to remove anything such massive in a manner that does not suit civilized persons and let me finish my genuine editing. You are welcome to ask for corrections on subject's talk page or to me but do not disrupt!!! --TheSawTooth (talk) 16:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
I repeat, I have no connection to the subject. I do not even live on the same side of the globe. So if you want to help me, point by point, case by case, ask me to make corrections and I will try my level best as you can see the effort I am doing to alter this subject which was edited by parties from different angles of the subject. I am impartial. In good faith, I have done another NPOV correction of my edit. Mindless approach is not civil --TheSawTooth (talk) 17:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi Sawtooth....you have reverted one of my edits Operation Zarb-e-Azb ...(involving cia and u.s) which i think is wrong ... Operation zarb-e-azb is PART of the ongoing U.S. War on Terror. It would be nice of you if you read the article .. War on Terror ....anyways thanks Saadkhan12345 (talk) 06:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
User talk:TheSawTooth: Difference between revisions
Add topic