| Revision as of 19:11, 11 July 2006 editParsssseltongue (talk | contribs)1,712 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:55, 11 July 2006 edit undoStarblind (talk | contribs)Administrators17,281 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Delete''' Nn notable, fails ].--] 18:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Nn notable, fails ].--] 18:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Non-notable. -] 18:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Non-notable. -] 18:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Desperate attention-seeking in which Misplaced Pages should not play a part. I don't even think a merge with ] is worthwhile, though I wouldn't oppose it either. ] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 19:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:55, 11 July 2006
Kentucky Fried Cruelty.com
Delete. Duly covered publicity stunt. Nothing more to say about the person, coverage is feeble. This is not notability.- CrazyRussian talk/email 15:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete As the external link says, "What's in a name?" --Richhoncho 17:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Finger-lickin' Delete as flunking web guidelines. Add a side of slaw. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 17:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable personality involved in notable news story covered in major publications. Why is everybody saying "non-notable"? Please defend that statement. 36,000+ Google hits, coverage in major publications (as stated in article). PT 17:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- I don't what you're talking about. 55 Google hits for both him and the website combined, since they share the name. Nothing notable about this person except the publicity stunt he made. - CrazyRussian talk/email 19:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Nn notable, fails WP:WEB.--John Lake 18:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable. -PresN 18:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Desperate attention-seeking in which Misplaced Pages should not play a part. I don't even think a merge with PETA is worthwhile, though I wouldn't oppose it either. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)