Misplaced Pages

Talk:HL Tauri: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:26, 10 November 2014 editHuntster (talk | contribs)Administrators47,429 edits →Age of HL Tauri system: reply.← Previous edit Revision as of 21:53, 10 November 2014 edit undoRscprinterBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Rollbackers27,555 edits Article appeared on In The News, added {{ITN talk}} banner to talkpage (T7)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPAstronomy|object=yes|class=start|importance=mid}} {{WPAstronomy|object=yes|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{ITN talk|10 November|2014}}


==Thanks for the article!== ==Thanks for the article!==

Revision as of 21:53, 10 November 2014

WikiProject iconAstronomy: Astronomical objects Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Misplaced Pages.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
In the newsA news item involving HL Tauri was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the In the news section on 10 November 2014.
Misplaced Pages
Misplaced Pages

Thanks for the article!

Thanks. Rursus dixit. (bork!) 11:55, 7 November 2014 (UTC)


Age of HL Tauri system

The newest article seems to state that the system is approximately 1,000,000 years old while the older reference in the synopsis states only 100,000 years old. Is there a need to update the synopsis with the new information perhaps? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SBHans13 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Until a paper can be produced showing that data, I'd prefer to use the refereed material over a press release. Also, the ESO release seems to be saying that the system is a maximum of a million years old, not that it is a million years. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Categories: