Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jimbo Wales: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:11, 12 November 2014 view sourceDammst (talk | contribs)102 edits →Hi← Previous edit Revision as of 19:26, 12 November 2014 view source QPT (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,235 editsm Reverted edits by Dammst (talk) to last version by SmallbonesNext edit →
Line 42: Line 42:
:Please reason with {{ping|Ryulong}} about this. You have clearly commented on the article many times. --] ] 21:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC) :Please reason with {{ping|Ryulong}} about this. You have clearly commented on the article many times. --] ] 21:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
:: There is a huge leap between commenting on an article or subject and being "involved" in an arbitration case. With such a low bar to participation, you might as well list every single editor who worked on an article as being involved in a case request. <font face="Rage Italic" size="4" color="#800080">]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">] ]</font></sup> 00:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC) :: There is a huge leap between commenting on an article or subject and being "involved" in an arbitration case. With such a low bar to participation, you might as well list every single editor who worked on an article as being involved in a case request. <font face="Rage Italic" size="4" color="#800080">]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">] ]</font></sup> 00:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

==Corruption on kickboxing, help==

Hello, PRehse, Mdtemp and Papaursa are again destroying the Misplaced Pages kickboxing (I bet these 3 are also linked). There are no kickboxing records on the internet, all the people are informing from the Misplaced Pages site. Look what are they doing: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Raul_C%C4%83tina%C8%99. The article is well written. Then the people had a discussion regarding this promotion which is currently the second in the world: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Martial_arts/Kickboxing_task_force#SUPERKOMBAT_Fighting_Championship. These users are simply ignoring the users based on their personal opinion and hate (SuperKombat should be added on the list, and even if a kickboxer is good to be allowed to be on Misplaced Pages if he holds first tiers trophies). Basically, PRehse deleted many SuperKombat fighters, now he asked help from his Mdtemp to do it. Before, it was Papaursa who helped him. They kept deleting kickboxers, unbelievable. Can't we have them on Misplaced Pages if they are notable enough? Remember, these were previously warned to stop deleting K-1 articles, huge events. ] (]) 17:11, 11 November 2014 (UTC)


== ] == == ] ==

Revision as of 19:26, 12 November 2014


    Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
    Start a new talk topic.
    Jimbo welcomes your comments and updates.
    He holds the founder's seat on the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees.
    The three trustees elected as community representatives until July 2015 are SJ, Phoebe, and Raystorm.
    The Wikimedia Foundation Senior Community Advocate is Maggie Dennis.
    This is Jimbo Wales's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
    Archives: Index, Index, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252Auto-archiving period: 1 day 
    This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.


    Archiving icon
    Archives
    Index –index–
    This manual archive index may be out of date.
    Future archives: 184 185 186

    This page has archives. Sections older than 24 hours may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present.
    (Manual archive list)

    Hi

    You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#GamerGate and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

    Thanks, --DSA510 Pls No Hate 19:25, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

    Please reason with @Ryulong: about this. You have clearly commented on the article many times. --DSA510 Pls No H8 21:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
    There is a huge leap between commenting on an article or subject and being "involved" in an arbitration case. With such a low bar to participation, you might as well list every single editor who worked on an article as being involved in a case request. Liz 00:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

    One Young World

    banned editor on his usual topic
    The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

    Jimbo, don't you think the One Young World article could use some improvement? For example, it mentions the Dublin 2014 event as if it is still in the future. Also, there is not a single word of criticism about the organization. Do you think that reliable sources have never critiqued the organization or its programs? - Stylecustom (talk) 00:17, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

    Jimbo shouldn't be held accountable for every single article on Misplaced Pages. A great way to adress the issues that you're having is by taking it up on the article's talk page where editors who are interested in that article can see your concerns. It would be quite wierd if Jimbo had to go over all 5979 pages with an NPOV dispute and fix them. He is the co-founder of Misplaced Pages but he's not a machine or miracle maker. Best Regards InsaneHacker (talk) 09:59, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
    Hey, thanks for your feedback, InsaneHacker. But, the reason this article may be more germane to Jimbo than other articles is that Jimbo delivered a presentation at the 2014 One Young World conference in Dublin. I just read an article at Wikipediocracy.com that suggests that most of One Young World has been written by people closely associated with the organization. So, if we bring that up on the Talk page, what's the typical solution? Do we just gut the article and start over, or is it okay as it is? - Stylecustom (talk) 14:35, 12 November 2014 (UTC)