Revision as of 14:18, 29 June 2013 edit201.215.187.159 (talk) →List of nearby objects: fmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:52, 13 November 2014 edit undoArtman40 (talk | contribs)2,039 edits →NotabilityNext edit → | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Comments welcome either here or on either of those two pages. The discussion on the WISE page should of course focus on WISE objects, that here on 2MASS objects, and that on the WikiProject talk page on astronomical objects generally. But there's some interconnection, equally obviously. ] (]) 07:03, 18 December 2012 (UTC) | Comments welcome either here or on either of those two pages. The discussion on the WISE page should of course focus on WISE objects, that here on 2MASS objects, and that on the WikiProject talk page on astronomical objects generally. But there's some interconnection, equally obviously. ] (]) 07:03, 18 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
At the moment 2MASS survey is referref in numerous scientific papers. Where to find additional citations for impact this survey had on astronomy? --] (]) 10:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
== List of nearby objects == | == List of nearby objects == |
Revision as of 10:52, 13 November 2014
Astronomy Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Citations
I do not understand this article needs more citations: There are 3 links to the original science publications over "2MASS" on the internet, the title article is an own citation of an scientific project, in the article there is a table with citations over the organizations who made the scientific project and the data sources. Is anywhere an article on Misplaced Pages with more citations than that article? Vibria (talk) 16:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- I am late to answer this question, but quite often readers are looking for inline citations to verify what they are reading is from a reliable source. -- Kheider (talk) 16:05, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Additional references to add
I'd like to expand this article, so as a placeholder for myself (and other interested editors), I'm putting links/citations for refs to use here.AstroCog (talk) 12:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Use of 2MASS in the 2MASS Redshift Survey (2MRS): article in Universe Today - with full sky image.
- "In the course of an infrared census." Sky & Telescope; Feb2000, Vol. 99 Issue 2, p50
- "2MASS Treasure Hunt". Sky & Telescope; Dec2000, Vol. 100 Issue 6, p54
- "2MASS Project". Astronomy; Apr2001, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p22
- "2MASS: Unveiling the Infrared Universe". Sky & Telescope; Jul2001, Vol. 102 Issue 1, p34-42
- "How 2MASS Surveyed the Sky". Sky & Telescope; Jul2001, Vol. 102 Issue 1, p38-39
- "All-sky survey makes Internet debut". Science News; 4/12/2003, Vol. 163 Issue 15, p237
- "Experiments with Wide-Spectrum CCD Imaging". Astronomy; May2002, Vol. 30 Issue 5, p78
- "Lost in space? Check the map". Astronomy; Aug2003, Vol. 31 Issue 8, p31
- "Nearby Universe Mapped". Discover; Jan2007, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p49-49
- "1.5 million galaxies revealed". Astronomy; Mar2008, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p41-43
- "Alien visitor from afar". Science News; 7/4/2009, Vol. 176 Issue 1, p9-9
- "The 2MASS Large Galaxy Atlas". T. H. Jarrett et al. 2003 The Astronomical Journal 125 525
Notability
There is a discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Astronomical objects#WISE object notability and Talk:WISEPC J150649.97+702736.0#Notability that has implications for 2MASS objects.
Specifically, the question being asked is whether a slightly more liberal notability test is appropriate for the closest objects to Sol, such as the nearest brown dwarfs discovered by WISE.
Comments welcome either here or on either of those two pages. The discussion on the WISE page should of course focus on WISE objects, that here on 2MASS objects, and that on the WikiProject talk page on astronomical objects generally. But there's some interconnection, equally obviously. Andrewa (talk) 07:03, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
At the moment 2MASS survey is referref in numerous scientific papers. Where to find additional citations for impact this survey had on astronomy? --Artman40 (talk) 10:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
List of nearby objects
This table is not a useful addition to the article, for several reasons.
- no explanation is given in the article as to why this information is important or relevant.
- it violates NPOV, giving extremely excessive weight to a tiny aspect of the 2MASS survey.
- it seems to be original research, having been compiled by a wikipedia editor rather than sourced from a reference.
No good reason has been given for its inclusion by the editor who is trying to force it in. The article is short so leave it in? Not a good reason. People have asked specifically for this information? Who? When? I suggested making a new article for this, which would be a perfectly good solution if you feel this information is valuable. Why did you reject that option? 201.215.187.159 (talk) 14:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Categories: