| Revision as of 14:25, 15 November 2014 editNE Ent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors20,717 edits →Please don't think I'm mad at you for suggesting this....: thanks← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:26, 16 November 2014 edit undoNeotarf (talk | contribs)4,029 edits →Cunt: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| You may have already thought about it, or not: an Arb run. Getting 50%+1 is a no brainer for you, and I honestly think that making the cut is more likely than not. I also see some value in having a non-admin as Arb, particularly when it comes to restoring trust and demonstrating equity within the community. When it comes to admin-like experience in a non-admin, you would up there at the top of the list. Anyway, not trying to talk you into it, just noting there is some value in the idea. Even if they forced you to RFA before actually getting the advanced tools, I think you would be safe. I tend to think the process itself would justify giving the tools while you were Arb, even if they took them back afterwards. Was curious to know if you had given it thought. ] - ] 00:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC) | You may have already thought about it, or not: an Arb run. Getting 50%+1 is a no brainer for you, and I honestly think that making the cut is more likely than not. I also see some value in having a non-admin as Arb, particularly when it comes to restoring trust and demonstrating equity within the community. When it comes to admin-like experience in a non-admin, you would up there at the top of the list. Anyway, not trying to talk you into it, just noting there is some value in the idea. Even if they forced you to RFA before actually getting the advanced tools, I think you would be safe. I tend to think the process itself would justify giving the tools while you were Arb, even if they took them back afterwards. Was curious to know if you had given it thought. ] - ] 00:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :Thank you, that's very flattering. While I do have some thoughts on the matter, as should be expected from an Ent (see ]), I'll need to think a bit before expounding further. <small>]</small> 14:25, 15 November 2014 (UTC) | :Thank you, that's very flattering. While I do have some thoughts on the matter, as should be expected from an Ent (see ]), I'll need to think a bit before expounding further. <small>]</small> 14:25, 15 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Cunt == | |||
| RE: --I don't really find that this word increases the gravitas of your talk page, or for that matter, any page. —] (]) 05:26, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:26, 16 November 2014
| Archives | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Please don't think I'm mad at you for suggesting this....
You may have already thought about it, or not: an Arb run. Getting 50%+1 is a no brainer for you, and I honestly think that making the cut is more likely than not. I also see some value in having a non-admin as Arb, particularly when it comes to restoring trust and demonstrating equity within the community. When it comes to admin-like experience in a non-admin, you would up there at the top of the list. Anyway, not trying to talk you into it, just noting there is some value in the idea. Even if they forced you to RFA before actually getting the advanced tools, I think you would be safe. I tend to think the process itself would justify giving the tools while you were Arb, even if they took them back afterwards. Was curious to know if you had given it thought. Dennis - 2¢ 00:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you, that's very flattering. While I do have some thoughts on the matter, as should be expected from an Ent (see Entmoot), I'll need to think a bit before expounding further. NE Ent 14:25, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Cunt
RE: your edit here--I don't really find that this word increases the gravitas of your talk page, or for that matter, any page. —Neotarf (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2014 (UTC)