|
Hullo. Please Click Here to leave me a new message. Please see my user page for more information about me.
- To messages left on my talk page, i respond on my talk page. If you are responding to a conversation I started on your talkpage, please respond there - rest assured I have bookmarked your page and won't miss your responses.
- You can write to me in any of the languages mentioned on my userpage. Usually I'll answer in English, unless you write in Swedish, then I'll use Swedish myself.
- My current time is 12:45 — please have that in mind if leaving time-sensitive comments.
- All messages on my talk page are archived once the page gets uncomfortably large.
- Please do not remove/revert things here, as I like to archive everything.
Babel:
*sv, en-5, de-2, es-2, no-2, da-2, fr-1, ja-0
|
Don't forget to watch this page, as I will respond here.
Error
Hey Mr.choppers,
I actually made a stupid error with file *File:2009 Mercedes CLK Class.jpg, When you said it was a DTM it was not. I actually meant to subtitle the picture "2007-2009 Mercedes CLK 350 (Australia)". I would kindly request you post that file above with the subtitle with the caption "2007-2009 Mercedes CLK 350 (Australia). You do not have to but I want you to do it if you can. Please next time always ask me before removing the image off wikipedia.
Nim Bhharathhan (talk) 08:46, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Look, we don't need more pictures of the C209. The IFCAR one you added is a better picture (as was the previous picture you reverted), as it better shows what the car looks like. I understand the desire to see your photos appear in articles but you have no explicit right to expect it, nor to demand that I ask your permission to remove something. See WP:OWN for more on that. As your photos keep getting better, you will find that other editors will choose to include them based on their quality alone. And please, keep your talkpage comments to one place and stop peppering my talkpage with so many new topics about the same thing. Mr.choppers | ✎ 02:21, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
 Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Panhard et Levassor Dynamic may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- positioned steering wheel.<ref name=Artc>{{citation | title = Artcurial Motorcars à Rétromobile (Vente n<sup>o</sup> 1957 | page = 110 | ref = ABPT | date = 2011-02-04 | publisher = Artcurial-
- z16794/Panhard-Dynamic.aspx Panhard et Levassor Dynamic X76 von 1938 bei ''conceptcarz.com'' (englisch]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Thursday December 4: NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)
190d
Hi, wanted to say I came acorss your pics of the 190d 2.5 Turbo here, here, and here. Aside from the euro headlights, I have one exactly like it. Same color too, cabernet red metallic. Mines bit worse for wear at the moment, working on fixing it up. This one even has an antenna delete like mine does. I have a flickr album of mine here if you want to take a look. Is this your car, or someone else's? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamdigitalman (talk • contribs) 02:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hi iamdigitalman, no, alas, it is not my car - I just saw it while out driving and thought it worth a few photos. Good luck fixing yours up, we need more old diesels and fewer hybrids! Mr.choppers | ✎ 02:28, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Your help is needed : harassment of Renault, Citroën etc.
Hello Mr.choppers, we need the help of a neutral and good faith person to prevent the article of Renault to be harassed by User:Urbanoc, User:Vrac, User:Warren_Whyte. They :
- remove some whole paragraphs, writing briefly that they were duplicated, but analysing what they removed, these paragraphs were not duplicated
- remove some photos, stating that they were "too numerous" in Renault. But the photos are 5 times more numerous (!!) in the Volkswagen article, and it is not a problem in this case for User:Urbanoc...
- remove some texts, stating that there is no source, even for the most obvious facts. A good faith editor search some sources. A bad faith editor take the excuse of no source, to remove a true information that he doesn't want to be shown, and without asking to anybody.... They behave as gods who own Misplaced Pages and are all-mighty
- ask to remove the awards only for Renault, in the company article and even in the model articles, and only these 3 people participate to this false discussion
- behave like that also on Dongfeng Peugeot-Citroën, Citroën and general articles, where they remove the picture of Renault Capture, that is yet the leader of its segment in Europe.
These 3 people behave as a lobby that use Misplaced Pages to harass some companies, but don't use the same arguments for the companies that they cherish. They send to each others some barn-stars to enable their accomplices to have some more important rights on Misplaced Pages, in order to have the power to harass more some companies and some contributors.
I will send you a few links to prove their bad faith. I will also write this on the Automotive portal. Good faith people are welcome.
Please participate to the "discussion" here : Talk:Renault#Awards
Regards.
|
