| Revision as of 00:45, 11 December 2014 editLaszlo Panaflex (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,226 edits →Mongol Empire edit warring: WP:TPOC← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:48, 11 December 2014 edit undoKrano (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,241 edits Notifying about suspicion of sockpuppeteering. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
| If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] (]) 19:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC) | If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] (]) 19:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :{{ping|User:Avono}} ] () looks an awful lot like a sockpuppet of Uniquark9 used for and to make some ] in agreement. ] (]) 00:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC) | :{{ping|User:Avono}} ] () looks an awful lot like a sockpuppet of Uniquark9 used for and to make some ] in agreement. ] (]) 00:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ==Sockpuppet investigation== | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| |Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into ] by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at ], where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ], and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you ''have'' been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community.{{#if:| ] (]) 11:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
| |] | |||
| }} ] (]) 11:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:48, 11 December 2014
Welcome!
|
Recent edit to Rahm Emanuel
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Jayakumar RG (talk) 07:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Rahm Emanuel. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.
Unician ∇ 09:41, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Northern Yuan dynasty has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Northern Yuan dynasty was changed by Uniquark9 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921944 on 2014-11-18T04:17:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Mongol Empire edit warring
Please stop edit warring at Mongol Empire and discuss the issue on the talk page there. The other user has stated a reason for not including your edits. Please discuss why you believe they should be included and seek consensus. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 18:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Also, please do not remove comments made by other editors on talk pages: WP:TOC. You have clearly violated WP:3RR and trying to remove evidence of your sock is disruptive editing. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 00:45, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Mongol Empire. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Avono (talk) 19:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Avono: User:Sparta300+1 (contributions) looks an awful lot like a sockpuppet of Uniquark9 used for another revert and to make some handy comments in agreement. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Uniquark9, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community.