| Revision as of 21:08, 27 October 2014 editSphilbrick (talk | contribs)Administrators178,716 edits →Clarification motion: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:14, 11 December 2014 edit undo86.46.222.25 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| A case (]) in which you were involved has been modified by {{oldid2|631252824|Motion|motion}} which changed the wording of the ] to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --]] 21:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC) | A case (]) in which you were involved has been modified by {{oldid2|631252824|Motion|motion}} which changed the wording of the ] to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --]] 21:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| Bastard. Rot in hell. | |||
Revision as of 22:14, 11 December 2014
 | Apparently racist abuse isn't grounds for blocking any more.... 2 lines of K303 19:46, 28 July 2012 (UTC) |
Suggestion
Hello! I noticed you contributed to Middlesex University entry on Misplaced Pages. If you studied at that University, please consider including this userbox on your userpage. Simply paste {{Template:User Middlesex}} to your userpage. You will be added into this category Thank you. Invest in knowledge (talk) 12:17, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Clarification motion
A case (The Troubles) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 21:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Bastard. Rot in hell.