| Revision as of 16:37, 14 December 2014 edit86.46.222.25 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:10, 14 December 2014 edit undoMurry1975 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users21,042 edits Reverted to revision 631373155 by Sphilbrick (talk): NPA. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| A case (]) in which you were involved has been modified by {{oldid2|631252824|Motion|motion}} which changed the wording of the ] to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --]] 21:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC) | A case (]) in which you were involved has been modified by {{oldid2|631252824|Motion|motion}} which changed the wording of the ] to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --]] 21:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| Bastard. Rot in hell. | |||
Revision as of 18:10, 14 December 2014
 | Apparently racist abuse isn't grounds for blocking any more.... 2 lines of K303 19:46, 28 July 2012 (UTC) |
Suggestion
Hello! I noticed you contributed to Middlesex University entry on Misplaced Pages. If you studied at that University, please consider including this userbox on your userpage. Simply paste {{Template:User Middlesex}} to your userpage. You will be added into this category Thank you. Invest in knowledge (talk) 12:17, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Clarification motion
A case (The Troubles) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 21:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC)