| Revision as of 00:52, 16 December 2014 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,975 editsm Archiving 4 discussion(s) to User talk:Toddy1/Archive 3) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:12, 21 December 2014 edit undoNo Source - No Valid Source (talk | contribs)63 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
| ] (]) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC) | ] (]) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:TomStar81@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=637824036 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:TomStar81@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=637824036 --> | ||
| ==Please stop possible ] == | |||
| Respectable and Peer-Reviewed Article-Sources have been added to the edited articles in question (i.e. ]). The neutral tone and encyclopaedic standard must be preserved at all time. It must be ensure that the reporting of different views on a subject adequately reflects the relative levels of support for those views, and that it does not give a false impression of parity, or give undue weight to a particular view. The above mentioned is usually encountered when opinions are stated as facts or poor sources are used. W must strive balanced set of information about the subject and not create a coatrack that goes out of its way to find facts that support a particular bias: An appropriate response to a coatrack article is to be bold and trim off excessive biased content (])! See also ] , ] and ]. I am sorry if this was not a case of ], but do please join in the discussion on the talk page of the relevant WP article. Cheers,] (]) 12:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:12, 21 December 2014
 Archives | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 24 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
| Wikibreak | Third opinion $220 | Chance? | Mediation $220 | Arbitration $240 | Jimbo Wales $200 | In the news $260 | On this day $260 | MediaWiki $150 | Did you know $280 | You are banned! |
| RFA $200 | WIKIOPOLY | FPC $300 | ||||||||
| PERM $180 | POTD $300 | |||||||||
| Community discussion | Community discussion | |||||||||
| Editor review $180 | FAC $320 | |||||||||
| Developers $200 | Rouge admin $200 | |||||||||
| Deletion review $160 | Chance? | |||||||||
| AFD $140 | TFA $350 | |||||||||
| Wikimedia Foundation $150 | Edit war (pay $100) | |||||||||
| CSD $140 | Main Page $400 |
|||||||||
| WP:BANNED Just browsing | WikiProject Spam $120 | UAA $100 | Chance? | AIV $100 | Admin cabal $200 | Teh Drahmaz (pay $200) | AN $60 | Community discussion | ANI $60 | Go Collect $200 salary as you pass  |
217.15.154.89 is not me
Nope. 217.15.154.89 and 219.77.53.143 are not the same person. 219.77.53.143 (talk) 09:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Salafi Jihadism
Thanks for your thoughtful input to the move discussion. Its semantics but I was wondering whether you could change your comment to something like:
Support a move but not to Salafism. This would at least keep the topic of a move on line.
Your input has really helped clarify things for me. I have been seeing label descriptions about the place and haven't been able to figure distinction from other terms. I was surprised to find that it was a neologism. What do you think of a merge to jihadism?
GregKaye ✍♪ 04:42, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- No. There is a jihadist movement amongst Salafis that is worth having an article about. But jihad is an Islamic phenomenon: it is not not restricted to Salafis. It is best to have two articles. In mathematics it is the issue of sets.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:36, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- My suggestion here was related to you RM suggestion of the use of "Jihadist-Salafism" or "Salafist-jihadism". On the issue of sets, do you consider that there are aspects of Salafist jihadism that are not covered under the already broad topic of jihadism?
- I was also wondering on the extent to which the Salafi/Salafist movement might be considered to extend to cover extremist groups like ISIL. On its page it is labelled as salafi jihadist. GregKaye ✍♪ 08:02, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- There is an article on the topic because it is considered . However caution is required because there are groups try to demonise Salafis; an analogous case is the way that groups used the media to demonise Jews in the 1920s and 30s. An article on the topic allows allows all aspects of the topic to be covered, to the extent that citations from reliable sources support. An ideal article on Salafist-jihadism would make it clear that only a minority of Salafis were jihadists, in the same way that Jews who are pimps/swindlers/communist revolutionaries are not typical of Jews. The people who claim the reverse are most-likely either self-seeking or are simply ill-informed. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:16, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Firearms to ukraine
This edit was not a POV edit. It even has it on Ukrainian media--Arbutus the tree (talk) 03:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- If your cousin needs an apartment West of Kiev (away from the fighting) and you buy her one, you are supporting her.
- If you sell your cousin the apartment for a profit, you are not supporting her. It is a big difference.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Ok then--Arbutus the tree (talk) 16:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Please stop possible WP:VAN
Respectable and Peer-Reviewed Article-Sources have been added to the edited articles in question (i.e. Italian Fascism). The neutral tone and encyclopaedic standard must be preserved at all time. It must be ensure that the reporting of different views on a subject adequately reflects the relative levels of support for those views, and that it does not give a false impression of parity, or give undue weight to a particular view. The above mentioned is usually encountered when opinions are stated as facts or poor sources are used. W must strive balanced set of information about the subject and not create a coatrack that goes out of its way to find facts that support a particular bias: An appropriate response to a coatrack article is to be bold and trim off excessive biased content (WP:CHERRY)! See also WP:WEIGHT , WP:YESPOV and WP:NOR. I am sorry if this was not a case of WP:VAN, but do please join in the discussion on the talk page of the relevant WP article. Cheers,No Source - No Valid Source (talk) 12:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)