| Revision as of 22:03, 21 December 2014 editSpartaz (talk | contribs)Administrators52,776 edits →Lanny Barby: cmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:30, 25 December 2014 edit undoРаціональне анархіст (talk | contribs)2,829 edits →Lanny BarbyNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| <small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ]<sup>]</sup> 00:44, 17 December 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->]</div> | <small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ]<sup>]</sup> 00:44, 17 December 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->]</div> | ||
| *'''Delete''' None of the keep votes has adduced any substantive coverage and are pretty much unevidenced assertion. This is a BLP that is inadequat5ely sourced. Needs deleting. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 22:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' None of the keep votes has adduced any substantive coverage and are pretty much unevidenced assertion. This is a BLP that is inadequat5ely sourced. Needs deleting. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 22:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - winning an industry award does not negate PORNBIO's mainstream notability requirement.--] (]) 06:30, 25 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:30, 25 December 2014
Lanny Barby
- Lanny Barby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete A non-notable pornstar with just 136 movies (per iafd). With no major award wins, no mainstream popularity, no revolutionary contributions to the porn industry, this page fails WP:PORNBIO. Her one possibly unique contribution to porn was having sex with her half-sister Kimberly Franklin on-camera, but Lanny's page doesn't even acknowledge this relationship. Redban (talk) 19:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator's generally accurate analysis. That supposedly "unique contribution" lacks genuinely reliable sourcing and is likely a bit of creepier-than-usual kayfabe. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 18:23, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: Relevancy is reduced by now, but note that a 2007 AfD (keep result) occurred at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lanny Barbie.--Milowent • 17:03, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - passes WP:PORNBIO + WP:GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- How does she pass PORNBIO, since she has no awards, only nominations, and other significant claims? Which of the article sources do you believe meet GBG requirements? The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:56, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - encyclopedic. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 21:07, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Unexplained vote that must carry minimal worth in this Afd. Redban (talk) 21:11, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Keep- win, so passes WP:PORNBIO + WP:GNG. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 13:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)- "win"? what win? She hasn't won any awards. Redban (talk) 16:46, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- Unexplained vote that must carry minimal worth in this Afd. Redban (talk) 21:11, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Based on sum total of coverage, nominations, Penthouse pet appearance, none of which may be sufficient in a vacuum by themselves. I am also troubled by Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_tagging_by_Redban in terms of evaluating the nomination.--Milowent • 16:36, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 00:44, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete None of the keep votes has adduced any substantive coverage and are pretty much unevidenced assertion. This is a BLP that is inadequat5ely sourced. Needs deleting. Spartaz 22:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - winning an industry award does not negate PORNBIO's mainstream notability requirement.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 06:30, 25 December 2014 (UTC)