Misplaced Pages

In the Sea of Sterile Mountains: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:45, 25 December 2014 editWhisperToMe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users662,778 edits Comment in URL← Previous edit Revision as of 16:47, 25 December 2014 edit undoWhisperToMe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users662,778 edits Found online copy!Next edit →
Line 12: Line 12:


==References== ==References==
* Scott, Samantha J. "Text as Discourse: The Chinese in Canada in Historiographical Perspective." '']''.<!--http://www.ualberta.ca/~pastimpe/home.htm--> ], 2005. Volume 11, p. 73-84. * Scott, Samantha J. "" (). '']''.<!--http://www.ualberta.ca/~pastimpe/home.htm--> ], 2005. Volume 11, p. 73-84. .
* Worden, Robert L. "" (book review). '']''. ], Vol. 36, No. 2 (Feb., 1977), pp. 347-349 . * Worden, Robert L. "" (book review). '']''. ], Vol. 36, No. 2 (Feb., 1977), pp. 347-349 .



Revision as of 16:47, 25 December 2014

In the Sea of Sterile Mountains: The Chinese in British Columbia is a 1974 book by James Morton, published by J. J. Douglas. It discusses the Chinese community in British Columbia from 1858 until 1971.

The book uses six documentaries and secondary sources total, while its remaining sources are newspaper articles and editorials.

Reception

Robert L. Worden, the author of a book review written for The Journal of Asian Studies, wrote that despite some issues with methodology and minor errors, "Morton's book is a good presentation of how British Columbians reacted to the Chinese".

Samantha J. Scott, the author of "Text as Discourse: The Chinese in Canada in Historiographical Perspective," criticized the lack of footnotes, the sourcing methodology, "explicit dialogue with previous texts," and the sourcing itself; Scott asserted that therefore "the conclusions drawn consequently appear unreliable." She argued, "Morton relies at random upon a very minute selection of newspaper articles and government records for which there is little accountability since the work is devoid of footnotes."

See also

References

Notes

  1. Worden, p. 347.
  2. Worden, p. 348.
  3. ^ Scott, p. 75.
Stub icon

This article about a book is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: