Revision as of 14:45, 30 December 2014 editHuon (talk | contribs)Administrators51,328 edits unblock request declined← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:54, 30 December 2014 edit undoUishaki (talk | contribs)14,984 edits →December 2014Next edit → | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
There was a disagreement between me and the IP because of the numbers. He reduced the numbers and came with other sources without any convincing reason. I could not watch these disruptive edits and stay silent.--] (]) 14:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | There was a disagreement between me and the IP because of the numbers. He reduced the numbers and came with other sources without any convincing reason. I could not watch these disruptive edits and stay silent.--] (]) 14:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
{{unblock | reason=I did not violate the topic, I only removed disruptive edits made by the IP. Could someone answer me why on earth this IP have to replace the sources with another sources. If I already was warned the situation would be different no. As I said above why disagreed about his controversial number figures not about why the refugees fled to Jordan.] (]) 14:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 14:54, 30 December 2014
Archives |
December 2014
To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there.Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." Administrators who reverse this block without the clear authorisation described in that procedure will be summarily desysopped.
This edit about Palestinian refugees in Lebanon violates your topic ban from WP:ARBPIA. These refugees have that status due to the Arab-Israeli conflict. The talk page at Talk:Palestinian refugee carries the ARBPIA banner. EdJohnston (talk) 15:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 Liverpool F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Allen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Enforcement discussion concerning your edits
user:Uishaki, please note that there is a discussion concerning your recent edits at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement |
Thank you.GreyShark (dibra) 17:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violation of your ARBPIA topic ban (note that this is in relation to these edits and not to the edits that prompted the AE request on the page Palestinians in Jordan, you have been blocked from editing for a period of a fortnight. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:47, 30 December 2014 (UTC)Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." Administrators who reverse this block without the clear authorisation described in that procedure will be summarily desysopped.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Uishaki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why is that article related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. I didn't know this and was never warned to revert my edits. This is so unjustified against me. I only removed inappropriate changes on numbers made by the IP adress. It was Shrike who decided to add this article to the ARBPIA and he is clearly pro-Israeli. Uishaki (talk) 14:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The first few lines of the source you used are: "Jordan is bordered by Saudi Arabia to the north-west, Syria to the south, Iraq to the south-west, and Israel/Palestine to the east. It has access to the Red Sea via the port city of Aqaba, located at the northern end of the Gulf of Aqaba ( Following the 1948 Arab–Israeli war approximately 900,000 Palestinian refugees were forced to flee their towns, villages, and homes ." Are you seriously asking why that could be related to the Arab-Israeli conflict? We're not that dumb, and neither are you. Huon (talk) 14:43, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
User:HJ Mitchell, Why was Special:Contributions/79.112.123.78 not blocked also for breaching the 1 revert rule on Palestinians in Jordan?--Uishaki (talk) 14:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- You have a point wrt the IP, but those are their only two edits ever (at least using that IP) and there's nothing to indicate they knew about the 1RR. I've since created an editnotice for the article using {{ARBPIA 1RR editnotice}}, so any future reverts can be sanctioned appropriately. As to you unblock request, the article is clearly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. It's almost entirely about Palestinian refugees in Jordan, who became such as a result of that conflict (and a significant chunk of the article is devoted to the effects of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. It even has {{ARBPIA}} on the talk page. And I strongly suggest you strike your personal attack on Shrike, or the likely result will be that your block will be extended and your ability to edit this talk page will be revoked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
There was a disagreement between me and the IP because of the numbers. He reduced the numbers and came with other sources without any convincing reason. I could not watch these disruptive edits and stay silent.--Uishaki (talk) 14:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Uishaki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not violate the topic, I only removed disruptive edits made by the IP. Could someone answer me why on earth this IP have to replace the sources with another sources. If I already was warned the situation would be different no. As I said above why disagreed about his controversial number figures not about why the refugees fled to Jordan.Uishaki (talk) 14:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I did not violate the topic, I only removed disruptive edits made by the IP. Could someone answer me why on earth this IP have to replace the sources with another sources. If I already was warned the situation would be different no. As I said above why disagreed about his controversial number figures not about why the refugees fled to Jordan.] (]) 14:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I did not violate the topic, I only removed disruptive edits made by the IP. Could someone answer me why on earth this IP have to replace the sources with another sources. If I already was warned the situation would be different no. As I said above why disagreed about his controversial number figures not about why the refugees fled to Jordan.] (]) 14:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I did not violate the topic, I only removed disruptive edits made by the IP. Could someone answer me why on earth this IP have to replace the sources with another sources. If I already was warned the situation would be different no. As I said above why disagreed about his controversial number figures not about why the refugees fled to Jordan.] (]) 14:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}