Misplaced Pages

User talk:WPPilot: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:08, 5 January 2015 editWPPilot (talk | contribs)10,129 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 16:18, 5 January 2015 edit undoHJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,844 edits rNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:


ok sorry about the spelling issue, changed. ]<span style="border:1px solid black;">'''&nbsp;]&nbsp;'''</span> 15:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC) ok sorry about the spelling issue, changed. ]<span style="border:1px solid black;">'''&nbsp;]&nbsp;'''</span> 15:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
:WPP: first, evading the block is a very bad idea. If I wanted to be an arse about it, you could be in some very hot water. Second, it's clear that you and BMK need to give each other some space for a while. Bishonen asked you nicely not to post on his talk page; the sensible thing to do would have been to find something else to do for a while, but you went and escalated the dispute by accusing him of various things on a talk page. My advice would be to take a break for 24 hours (I deliberately only went for a very short block) and come back refreshed, but I'll let another admin review the unblock request. ] &#124; ] 16:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:18, 5 January 2015

DOD 1/5/2014 - today is the worse day of my life. For 20 years this beautiful girl has been at my side, waiting at my door and purring me to sleep, each and every night. In a hour I have to put her down. To add to the pain a Misplaced Pages admin has banned me, from the site for speaking my mind and replying to another users comments. I guess the first amendment is out the window here. I have never felt worse in my 50plus years on this earth and I owe Misplaced Pages a big thank you for helping make this the worse day ever. talk→ WPPilot  16:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Purr Lexus Persian Kitty January 3 2015 19 years and 6 months old
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for antagonising another editor after being told to leave them alone. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)


This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

WPPilot (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have not edited on Beyond My Kens page, as the admin claims I did, that is simply not truthful. I replied to another users comments regarding that user, there is no interaction ban between us, and all I did was to comment and reply to another user on a project talk page, HJ claims I was deliberately antagonising another editor, that simply is untrue. I have not been requested to not reply to other editors or pretend that the user in question is protected and I am unable to even mention the users name yet that user can do whatever he likes to, I have already announced that I would avoid him, and the pages he edits. No one ever said I could not even mention him. The comment was "Please don't post on BMK's page again, it's obvious he doesn't want you to and that means you need to stop." yet I post, on a project page, in reply to another editor that notices what I had mentioned and that gets me a 24 hour ban... unjust

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have not edited on Beyond My Kens page, as the admin claims I did, that is simply not truthful. I replied to another users comments regarding that user, there is no interaction ban between us, and all I did was to comment and reply to another user on a project talk page, HJ claims I was deliberately antagonising another editor, that simply is untrue. I have not been requested to not reply to other editors or pretend that the user in question is protected and I am unable to even mention the users name yet that user can do whatever he likes to, I have already announced that I would avoid him, and the pages he edits. No one ever said I could not even mention him. The comment was "Please don't post on ]'s page again, it's obvious he doesn't want you to and that means you need to stop." yet I post, on a project page, in reply to another editor that notices what I had mentioned and that gets me a 24 hour ban... unjust |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not edited on Beyond My Kens page, as the admin claims I did, that is simply not truthful. I replied to another users comments regarding that user, there is no interaction ban between us, and all I did was to comment and reply to another user on a project talk page, HJ claims I was deliberately antagonising another editor, that simply is untrue. I have not been requested to not reply to other editors or pretend that the user in question is protected and I am unable to even mention the users name yet that user can do whatever he likes to, I have already announced that I would avoid him, and the pages he edits. No one ever said I could not even mention him. The comment was "Please don't post on ]'s page again, it's obvious he doesn't want you to and that means you need to stop." yet I post, on a project page, in reply to another editor that notices what I had mentioned and that gets me a 24 hour ban... unjust |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not edited on Beyond My Kens page, as the admin claims I did, that is simply not truthful. I replied to another users comments regarding that user, there is no interaction ban between us, and all I did was to comment and reply to another user on a project talk page, HJ claims I was deliberately antagonising another editor, that simply is untrue. I have not been requested to not reply to other editors or pretend that the user in question is protected and I am unable to even mention the users name yet that user can do whatever he likes to, I have already announced that I would avoid him, and the pages he edits. No one ever said I could not even mention him. The comment was "Please don't post on ]'s page again, it's obvious he doesn't want you to and that means you need to stop." yet I post, on a project page, in reply to another editor that notices what I had mentioned and that gets me a 24 hour ban... unjust |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
  • You know, to first remove the block template (which stated the block reason) and then appeal the block by talking about what the admin "claims" is very nonsensical behavior, and creates extra work for any reviewing admin. If you expect some uninvolved admin to take this seriously, you should put back HJ Mitchell's block notice (it doesn't quite say what you say it says, so you may want to reconsider the phrasing of your request). British English spelling isn't a "spelling error", by the way. Bishonen | talk 15:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC).

ok sorry about the spelling issue, changed. talk→ WPPilot  15:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

WPP: first, evading the block is a very bad idea. If I wanted to be an arse about it, you could be in some very hot water. Second, it's clear that you and BMK need to give each other some space for a while. Bishonen asked you nicely not to post on his talk page; the sensible thing to do would have been to find something else to do for a while, but you went and escalated the dispute by accusing him of various things on a talk page. My advice would be to take a break for 24 hours (I deliberately only went for a very short block) and come back refreshed, but I'll let another admin review the unblock request. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Category: