| Revision as of 02:22, 6 January 2015 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,971 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof/Archives/2014/December) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:34, 7 January 2015 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,971 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof/Archives/2014/December) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| <!-- Template:Cheezburgr --> | <!-- Template:Cheezburgr --> | ||
| == ] == | |||
| There's questionable and unreliable sources anywhere (including MuuMuse, guitarsweepstakes.com). Can you remove and keep an eye that who may doing the same pattern. ] (]) 05:41, 22 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, agreed, that's a pretty bad source and effectively promotional, too. I'll take a look, thanks. ] (]) 05:44, 22 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Shooting of Michael Brown == | == Shooting of Michael Brown == | ||
Revision as of 01:34, 7 January 2015
Can Haz Cheezburger
↢ RemorA ↣ haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!
Thanks for the resolution for POV Issues within Subpage. It was far more elegant and fair than what I had thought of.
Also, thank you for being one of the reasonable voices in the GG article. I know this wikiluvz is late, but hope you'll still accept it :).
Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk paj with friendly messuj to all.
Shooting of Michael Brown
Shooting of Michael Brown is a NPOV and formerly BLP nightmare. I'm having an issue with the page that is beginning to seem like Gamergate because some editors with a gross misunderstanding of policy are seeking to "establish consensus" before removing even obviously false material from the article. Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown#Cwobeel inserting false material is just one case, but it is like pulling teeth. Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown#Tim Nolan removed and then the Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown#Tim Nolan RFC is an example of the extreme lengths to get something factually inaccurate and a BLP issue off a page. Over a dozen misrepresentations to outright personal attacks have been inserted and defended by editors for the sake of process because it is "verifiable to a source". Given that you had to remove a bunch of similar BLP issues for Gamergate under slightly difference circumstances, your thoughts on this matter would be appreciated. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:05, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, one clusterfuck of an off-wiki-POV-warrior-filled article is all I can take. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 21:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages IRC for Revisions
Hello, NorthBySouthBaranof. I know that we might have different opinions on things, but I wanted to at least mention something that at the least might be of some help in the future. I do admit that you might already know this, but I am not certain on that, hence this post. Misplaced Pages has multiple Internet Relay Chat (IRC) channels available, with one in particular being dedicated toward making an urgent request for a revision deletion, #wikipedia-en-revdel. I hope that this post is of some help to you in the future. --Super Goku V (talk) 03:24, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
I've replied to your email by email -- just in case you missed that in a spam filter or something. MarkBernstein (talk) 19:08, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
note WP:BLP
Per ArbCom decisions, note that any admin may block you or ban you for violations of WP:BLP. I suggest you self-revert your current violation at Breitbart (website) Collect (talk) 21:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- I suggest that there is no BLP violation in stating that an article which is widely reported as false and untruthful, is in fact, false and untruthful. The article neither states nor implies that this falsehood was intentional, but the result is the same: the author wrote and published a verifiable falsehood. If you believe this is actually a BLP violation, I invite you to raise the issue on BLPN or ANI. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 21:09, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Then I suggest you use wording which makes clear that no implications about the living person writing the article are made in any way. Cheers. Collect (talk) 21:24, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
WP:WW
Hi, did you mean to link to WP:WW in your edit summary at Leelah Alcorn? I'm guessing you meant to link to WP:WEASEL, you might want to dummy edit a clarification :) Sam Walton (talk) 17:42, 1 January 2015 (UTC)