| Revision as of 01:28, 8 January 2015 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,971 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof/Archives/2014/December) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:31, 9 January 2015 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,971 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof/Archives/2014/December) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| <!-- Template:Cheezburgr --> | <!-- Template:Cheezburgr --> | ||
| == Misplaced Pages IRC for Revisions == | |||
| Hello, NorthBySouthBaranof. I know that we might have different opinions on things, but I wanted to at least mention something that at the least might be of some help in the future. I do admit that you might already know this, but I am not certain on that, hence this post. Misplaced Pages has multiple Internet Relay Chat (IRC) channels available, with ] being dedicated toward making an urgent request for a revision deletion, <nowiki>#wikipedia-en-revdel</nowiki>. I hope that this post is of some help to you in the future. --] (]) 03:24, 24 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Email == | == Email == | ||
Revision as of 01:31, 9 January 2015
Can Haz Cheezburger
↢ RemorA ↣ haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!
Thanks for the resolution for POV Issues within Subpage. It was far more elegant and fair than what I had thought of.
Also, thank you for being one of the reasonable voices in the GG article. I know this wikiluvz is late, but hope you'll still accept it :).
Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk paj with friendly messuj to all.
I've replied to your email by email -- just in case you missed that in a spam filter or something. MarkBernstein (talk) 19:08, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
note WP:BLP
Per ArbCom decisions, note that any admin may block you or ban you for violations of WP:BLP. I suggest you self-revert your current violation at Breitbart (website) Collect (talk) 21:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- I suggest that there is no BLP violation in stating that an article which is widely reported as false and untruthful, is in fact, false and untruthful. The article neither states nor implies that this falsehood was intentional, but the result is the same: the author wrote and published a verifiable falsehood. If you believe this is actually a BLP violation, I invite you to raise the issue on BLPN or ANI. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 21:09, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Then I suggest you use wording which makes clear that no implications about the living person writing the article are made in any way. Cheers. Collect (talk) 21:24, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
WP:WW
Hi, did you mean to link to WP:WW in your edit summary at Leelah Alcorn? I'm guessing you meant to link to WP:WEASEL, you might want to dummy edit a clarification :) Sam Walton (talk) 17:42, 1 January 2015 (UTC)