| Revision as of 19:39, 11 January 2015 editBrustopher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,111 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:40, 11 January 2015 edit undoBrustopher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,111 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| :Not a problem at all — to the contrary, ''thank you'' for pitching in to clean up after yet another troll hell-bent on using Misplaced Pages to defame their enemies. There's no shortage of them. ] (]) 08:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC) | :Not a problem at all — to the contrary, ''thank you'' for pitching in to clean up after yet another troll hell-bent on using Misplaced Pages to defame their enemies. There's no shortage of them. ] (]) 08:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ==You've got mail== | |||
| {{You've got mail}} ] (]) 19:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC) | {{You've got mail}} ] (]) 19:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:40, 11 January 2015
Can Haz Cheezburger
↢ RemorA ↣ haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!
Thanks for the resolution for POV Issues within Subpage. It was far more elegant and fair than what I had thought of.
Also, thank you for being one of the reasonable voices in the GG article. I know this wikiluvz is late, but hope you'll still accept it :).
Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk paj with friendly messuj to all.
note WP:BLP
Per ArbCom decisions, note that any admin may block you or ban you for violations of WP:BLP. I suggest you self-revert your current violation at Breitbart (website) Collect (talk) 21:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- I suggest that there is no BLP violation in stating that an article which is widely reported as false and untruthful, is in fact, false and untruthful. The article neither states nor implies that this falsehood was intentional, but the result is the same: the author wrote and published a verifiable falsehood. If you believe this is actually a BLP violation, I invite you to raise the issue on BLPN or ANI. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 21:09, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Then I suggest you use wording which makes clear that no implications about the living person writing the article are made in any way. Cheers. Collect (talk) 21:24, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
WP:WW
Hi, did you mean to link to WP:WW in your edit summary at Leelah Alcorn? I'm guessing you meant to link to WP:WEASEL, you might want to dummy edit a clarification :) Sam Walton (talk) 17:42, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Suppressed edit
Apologies for having to redact an edit from your talkpage - this is a serial BLP abuser using an IP to evade a block. -- Euryalus (talk) 08:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Not a problem at all — to the contrary, thank you for pitching in to clean up after yet another troll hell-bent on using Misplaced Pages to defame their enemies. There's no shortage of them. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 08:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.