| Revision as of 14:21, 12 January 2015 editSummichum (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,484 edits Final warning: Using Misplaced Pages for advertising or promotion on Mufaddal Saifuddin. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:21, 12 January 2015 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,226 edits →Topic ban from the Dawoodi Bohra: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
| == January 2015 == | == January 2015 == | ||
| ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you ], as you did at ]. ]<!-- Template:uw-advert4 --> ] (]) 14:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC) | ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you ], as you did at ]. ]<!-- Template:uw-advert4 --> ] (]) 14:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Topic ban from the ] == | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| |2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg | |||
| |imagesize=50px | |||
| |1=The following sanction now applies to you: | |||
| {{Talkquote|1=Topic ban from anything to do with the ] on all pages of Misplaced Pages, including talk}} | |||
| You have been sanctioned because you are unable to edit neutrally on this topic. You <u></u> without making any effort to get support from others on Talk | |||
| This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an ] under the authority of the ]'s decision at ] and, if applicable, the procedure described at ]. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the ] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be ] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. | |||
| You may appeal this sanction using the process described ]. I recommend that you use the ] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> ] (]) 16:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
Revision as of 16:21, 12 January 2015
Welcome!
|
January 2015
Hello, I'm Summichum. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dawoodi Bohra, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Summichum (talk) 14:09, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Summichum, you seem to feel a lot of my points need removing but I am not getting any reasons as to why. Would be grateful if you could explain. In the interest of neutrality both points of vew should be shown but you have not even maintained references from the Quran itself.
Which reference are you referring to above? I'd be interested to know why you felt that was unreliable whilst on the other hand the following - The practice of Sajda (Prostration) was started by 51st Dai Taher Saifuddin and went to the extent of claiming that he is “Elahul-Ard” (God on earth) in which the source material is entirely one sided is considered acceptable. Indeed the claim being made has not been given a verfiable source.
Look forward to hearing from you. Have a good day.Noughtnotout (talk) 06:46, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages: check out the Teahouse!
|
Hello! Noughtnotout, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Misplaced Pages for new editors to ask questions about editing Misplaced Pages, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Charles (talk) 15:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC) |
Articles on the Dawoodi Bohra are covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBIPA
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Template:Z33 EdJohnston (talk) 05:41, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by PrimeHunter (talk) 06:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by LouiseS1979 08:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui 水 10:54, 12 January 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
January 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Misplaced Pages for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Mufaddal Saifuddin. Summichum (talk) 14:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Topic ban from the Dawoodi Bohra
The following sanction now applies to you:
Topic ban from anything to do with the Dawoodi Bohra on all pages of Misplaced Pages, including talk
You have been sanctioned because you are unable to edit neutrally on this topic. You declare one party to the DB succession controversy to be the winner without making any effort to get support from others on Talk
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. EdJohnston (talk) 16:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- "oppressive". Retrieved 10 January 2015.