| Revision as of 09:47, 6 January 2015 editBryce Carmony (talk | contribs)2,039 edits →Dota 2← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:45, 16 January 2015 edit undoAndyjsmith (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers37,702 edits Caution: Unconstructive editing on Executive summary. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| -Bryce Carmony | -Bryce Carmony | ||
| == January 2015 == | |||
| ] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. Your edits appear to be ] and have been ] or removed. | |||
| * If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ]. | |||
| * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. | |||
| Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's ], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in ]. ''I don't understand why you deliberately altered a direct quotation so as to make it incorrect and misleading. Are you trying to make some sort of a point? If so the article is not the point - that's what the talk page is for. Please do not do this. ''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> ] (]) 07:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:45, 16 January 2015
Dota 2
Hello Bryce,
I'm posting on (and starting) your talk page because I am very impressed with your recent work on the Dota 2 page. You see, I created that page over four years ago and have been its top editor ever since, bringing it all the way to Good Article status and it is now on the cusp of Featured Article status. However, I cannot continue editing Misplaced Pages regularly, which is why I am looking for a successor for taking care of the page and bringing it to FA status. Would you be interested in undertaking this task? DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 04:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Hey!
I could definitly look at taking a look at the Dota 2 page. the main things I see that keep it from FA quality is the overall tone reads like an advert to me, I've taken down a lot of the peacock phrases to try and help bring it to a more NPOV that could score QA status. but I think there might be some larger problems as well ( structure of the article as a hole ) but I'd be happy to continue to try and help get it to QA quality. I'll read all the QA articles for other sportsgames and see what motiffs we can emulate to get it to top notch.
-Bryce Carmony
January 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Executive summary. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. I don't understand why you deliberately altered a direct quotation so as to make it incorrect and misleading. Are you trying to make some sort of a point? If so the article is not the point - that's what the talk page is for. Please do not do this. andy (talk) 07:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)