| Revision as of 00:47, 18 January 2015 editAndyjsmith (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers37,702 edits Warning: Vandalism on Executive summary. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:33, 18 January 2015 edit undoBryce Carmony (talk | contribs)2,039 edits →January 2015Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| == January 2015 == | == January 2015 == | ||
| ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. ''I've warned you before on several occasions so I'm no longer giving you the benefit of the doubt. You deliberately introduced inaccuracies into this article by altering a direct quote. It's not the first time you've done it. It I suggest you make sure it's the last. ''<!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> ] (]) 00:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC) | ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. ''I've warned you before on several occasions so I'm no longer giving you the benefit of the doubt. You deliberately introduced inaccuracies into this article by altering a direct quote. It's not the first time you've done it. It I suggest you make sure it's the last. ''<!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> ] (]) 00:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| That was a test edit. I meant to sandbox it so I changed it back. don't lie about vandalism so much. | |||
Revision as of 01:33, 18 January 2015
Dota 2
Hello Bryce,
I'm posting on (and starting) your talk page because I am very impressed with your recent work on the Dota 2 page. You see, I created that page over four years ago and have been its top editor ever since, bringing it all the way to Good Article status and it is now on the cusp of Featured Article status. However, I cannot continue editing Misplaced Pages regularly, which is why I am looking for a successor for taking care of the page and bringing it to FA status. Would you be interested in undertaking this task? DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 04:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Hey!
I could definitly look at taking a look at the Dota 2 page. the main things I see that keep it from FA quality is the overall tone reads like an advert to me, I've taken down a lot of the peacock phrases to try and help bring it to a more NPOV that could score QA status. but I think there might be some larger problems as well ( structure of the article as a hole ) but I'd be happy to continue to try and help get it to QA quality. I'll read all the QA articles for other sportsgames and see what motiffs we can emulate to get it to top notch.
-Bryce Carmony
January 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Executive summary, you may be blocked from editing. I've warned you before on several occasions so I'm no longer giving you the benefit of the doubt. You deliberately introduced inaccuracies into this article by altering a direct quote. It's not the first time you've done it. It I suggest you make sure it's the last. andy (talk) 00:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
That was a test edit. I meant to sandbox it so I changed it back. don't lie about vandalism so much.