| Revision as of 14:47, 19 January 2015 editPanyd (talk | contribs)16,595 edits →Executive summary: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:21, 19 January 2015 edit undoA.Minkowiski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,864 edits →Executive summary: addNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| Please discuss your issues further on the talk page for this article. It's been requested that the article be protected, but I'm sure you and Andyjsmith will be able to talk this out between yourselves which would avoid page protection. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:47, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | Please discuss your issues further on the talk page for this article. It's been requested that the article be protected, but I'm sure you and Andyjsmith will be able to talk this out between yourselves which would avoid page protection. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:47, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| : I would like to add that please ] both of you and consider ] so that to avoid page protection in future. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:20, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:21, 19 January 2015
Dota 2
Hello Bryce,
I'm posting on (and starting) your talk page because I am very impressed with your recent work on the Dota 2 page. You see, I created that page over four years ago and have been its top editor ever since, bringing it all the way to Good Article status and it is now on the cusp of Featured Article status. However, I cannot continue editing Misplaced Pages regularly, which is why I am looking for a successor for taking care of the page and bringing it to FA status. Would you be interested in undertaking this task? DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 04:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Hey!
I could definitly look at taking a look at the Dota 2 page. the main things I see that keep it from FA quality is the overall tone reads like an advert to me, I've taken down a lot of the peacock phrases to try and help bring it to a more NPOV that could score QA status. but I think there might be some larger problems as well ( structure of the article as a hole ) but I'd be happy to continue to try and help get it to QA quality. I'll read all the QA articles for other sportsgames and see what motiffs we can emulate to get it to top notch.
-Bryce Carmony
January 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Executive summary, you may be blocked from editing. I've warned you before on several occasions so I'm no longer giving you the benefit of the doubt. You deliberately introduced inaccuracies into this article by altering a direct quote. It's not the first time you've done it. It I suggest you make sure it's the last. andy (talk) 00:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
That was a test edit. I meant to sandbox it so I changed it back. don't lie about vandalism so much.
License tagging for File:BoardGameSplendorLogoFairUse.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BoardGameSplendorLogoFairUse.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. andy (talk) 21:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Executive summary
Please discuss your issues further on the talk page for this article. It's been requested that the article be protected, but I'm sure you and Andyjsmith will be able to talk this out between yourselves which would avoid page protection. Panyd 14:47, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- I would like to add that please assume good faith both of you and consider dispute resolution so that to avoid page protection in future. A.Minkowiski 15:20, 19 January 2015 (UTC)