| Revision as of 18:38, 17 July 2006 editTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 edits →Removing comments: I'm afraid you're at risk of pandering to this harassment of a valued editor.. The correct thing to do is remove the attack. I've blocked Karwynn for an hour← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:38, 17 July 2006 edit undoKarwynn (talk | contribs)1,120 edits restored defenseNext edit → | ||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
| ::Above editor is crusing for an indef block for violating ], for any avid readers. ] - ] 18:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | ::Above editor is crusing for an indef block for violating ], for any avid readers. ] - ] 18:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::The disputed edits are not being made to an encyclopedia article! Said policy does not apply! What are you talking about?! | |||
| :::I'd ] ] ] 18:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I'm afraid you're at risk of pandering to this harassment of a valued editor.. The correct thing to do is remove the attack. I've blocked Karwynn for an hour for harassment and edit warring. --] 18:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | I'm afraid you're at risk of pandering to this harassment of a valued editor.. The correct thing to do is remove the attack. I've blocked Karwynn for an hour for harassment and edit warring. --] 18:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :If you're going to accuse me of a poliicy violation, don't remove my comments defending myself. We're equals. We will discuss your accusations as such. If you don't want my comments on your page (understandable), remove the accusation. ] ] 20:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:38, 17 July 2006
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Jan06. Sections without timestamps are not archived |
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Jun06
Please comment on plagiarism
Thanks. Here you go. ____G_o_o_d____
of interest
Thought you mind find this MfD of interest. PT 22:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
User:SirIsaacBrock
I think there's enough cause that this user should be banned per the "Exhausted the community's patience" clause of the blocking policy... which would negate the need to go through ArbCom but we'll see. That's the direction to head in, first... community ban... and ArbCom if necessary. (→Netscott) 17:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- All because I tagged his pet articles for prod. Waste of fking time. Hipocrite - «Talk» 17:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- I personally think he deserves a barnstar for his efforts, but I might lack NPOV -:) Cordially SirIsaacBrock 18:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hipocrite, I do need some assistance if you've got a small bit of time. Can you go to Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/WritersCramp and follow the contributions of the editors listed therein and try to clearly establish that they were the sockpuppets of User:SirIsaacBrock/User:WritersCramp? If you could start with User:WritersCramp in particular that'd be great. Cheers. (→Netscott) 21:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- I personally think he deserves a barnstar for his efforts, but I might lack NPOV -:) Cordially SirIsaacBrock 18:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL
Obviously, it was a mistake, so I would appreciate a kinder approach from you. PT 18:13, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Consensus Process at Democratic Underground
You might want to poke your head in at the DU talk page and leave your opinion. Looks like the CUers are hijacking the process yet again. 216.55.177.58 23:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
AfD
I have no idea who User:SirIsaacBrock is, or what he has done to incense some people, but I find it hard to see your putting rat-baiting up for AFD as anything other than disrupting Misplaced Pages to make a point. –Joke 01:47, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Re: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kent-Meridian High School
Thank you so much for the defense. I was clueless that schools were a hot-button topic when I nominated it. The article has been supstantially changed and merged with another since I nominated it. Plus I have withdrawn the nomination twice and promised never to touch a school page again (which I will not). It's obvious that User:RJHall's spamming works and people vote without reading the comments. Very disillusioning. So it is very nice to get support from you. Thank you again. KarenAnn 14:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Baiting
I believe that while the article needs a complete rewrite, the middle of an AfD is not the best time to cut the article down to nothing without adding anything redeeming back. There is no hurry here, so why not just sit back and let AfD take it's course before starting the rewrite process. — Laura Scudder ☎ 16:06, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
User:Capit
I noticed that you pout a suspected sockpuppet of SirIssacBrock notice on Capit's page. Any reason in particular? Metros232 17:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Removing comments
Removing comments from talk and user talk pages without good reason ("I don't like it" being an example of a bad reason) is considered vandalism, not that this is news to you. So you'll want to stop. Thanks, Psycho Master (Karwynn) 18:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- When I open a talk discussion based on a disputed edit on your talk page and you ignore it and give me a warning on my own page about the EXACT SAME MATTER, it generally doesn't look good. Do not remove mine or anyone else's comments from anyone else's talk page. it's vandalism. Not like, an interpretation of WP:VANDAL. It's spelled right out!
- Deleting the comments of other users from article Talk pages, or deleting entire sections thereof, is generally considered vandalism.
- Don't ignore my comments and make bad-faith warnings on my talk page, and don't delete comments from talk pages! Psycho Master (Karwynn) 18:22, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Above editor is crusing for an indef block for violating WP:ENC, for any avid readers. Hipocrite - «Talk» 18:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- The disputed edits are not being made to an encyclopedia article! Said policy does not apply! What are you talking about?!
I'm afraid you're at risk of pandering to this harassment of a valued editor.. The correct thing to do is remove the attack. I've blocked Karwynn for an hour for harassment and edit warring. --Tony Sidaway 18:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- If you're going to accuse me of a poliicy violation, don't remove my comments defending myself. We're equals. We will discuss your accusations as such. If you don't want my comments on your page (understandable), remove the accusation. Psycho Master (Karwynn) 20:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)