Revision as of 00:36, 21 January 2015 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,657 editsm Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:TenPoundHammer/Archive 14) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:28, 22 January 2015 edit undoReferenceBot (talk | contribs)48,157 edits Bot: Notice of potential reference breakingNext edit → | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
==Hidden Agenda== | ==Hidden Agenda== | ||
Go ahead and delete it. I didn't know as much about notability requirements back then. I've tried to get around to expanding it, but other things in my work here have a higher priority, and I'm not sure I could have done much anyway. In short, I don't mind seeing the article go. Thanks, --] (]) 19:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC) | Go ahead and delete it. I didn't know as much about notability requirements back then. I've tried to get around to expanding it, but other things in my work here have a higher priority, and I'm not sure I could have done much anyway. In short, I don't mind seeing the article go. Thanks, --] (]) 19:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Reference Errors on 21 January == | |||
] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows: | |||
*On the ] page, caused a ] <small>(])</small>. ( | ) | |||
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can . | |||
Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->] (]) 00:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:28, 22 January 2015
NEW MESSAGES GO TO THE BOTTOM. NOT THE TOP. I don't care if you respond to me here or on your talk page. But if you prefer the latter, please let me know in some way. |
Template:Archive box collapsible
Saving Country Music Can NOT Be Under Reviews for any singles, or albums!
Stop taking quotes from Saving Country Music and putting them under singer's critical reception sections for any music pages(this and Country Perspective for that matter), these are non notable critics, and should not be used in an Encyclopedia article. You could just as well buy a web domain and write these reviews yourself, it does not mean your opinions belong on Misplaced Pages.
The Beatles Invite
Hi! I've seen you around on The Beatles' articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Beatles, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Beatles on Misplaced Pages? Please feel free to join us. | |||||||
Abbey Road... You're not in this picture... yet!
|
Notice
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Reporting Harassment / Wikihounding" OTRS ticket 2015011510021553. Thank you. Dusti 01:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 16 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Band Famous (2nd nomination) page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holly Dunn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Johnny Prill
A while ago you started an afd for Johnny Prill. In your nomination you stated "(a two-sentence review on his single, a couple brief blurbs in the Detroit Free Press — "Disc of the week" is definitely trivial)." Can I ask you to clarify if you remember well enough? Did you read multiple pieces from Detroit Free Press. Did they go beyond one or two sentences? Would you call the depth of coverage? Thanks for your time. duffbeerforme (talk) 16:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Hidden Agenda
Go ahead and delete it. I didn't know as much about notability requirements back then. I've tried to get around to expanding it, but other things in my work here have a higher priority, and I'm not sure I could have done much anyway. In short, I don't mind seeing the article go. Thanks, --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 19:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 21 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Village People page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)