| Revision as of 00:40, 11 January 2015 editTurnopoems (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,944 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:08, 23 January 2015 edit undoYkantor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,778 edits →Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion: Turnopoems complain is a bit bizarre, as it seems that he is the one who violates the rulesNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| You have continued to engage in edit warring despite several invitations to discuss the matter and a warning that continued disregard will be reported. Consensus is not reached in the summary of an edit. Furthermore, editing without consensus when the opposing side doesn't respond in the discussion is a fully acceptable way of solving a dispute as defined in ]. Instead of continuously reverting please use the article's ] to work toward consensus. ] (]) 00:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC) | You have continued to engage in edit warring despite several invitations to discuss the matter and a warning that continued disregard will be reported. Consensus is not reached in the summary of an edit. Furthermore, editing without consensus when the opposing side doesn't respond in the discussion is a fully acceptable way of solving a dispute as defined in ]. Instead of continuously reverting please use the article's ] to work toward consensus. ] (]) 00:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| : ] (]) 13:08, 23 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:08, 23 January 2015
 Archives |
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
You have continued to engage in edit warring despite several invitations to discuss the matter and a warning that continued disregard will be reported. Consensus is not reached in the summary of an edit. Furthermore, editing without consensus when the opposing side doesn't respond in the discussion is a fully acceptable way of solving a dispute as defined in WP:BRD. Instead of continuously reverting please use the article's talk page to work toward consensus. Turnopoems (talk) 00:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)