| Revision as of 00:43, 29 January 2015 editClarityfiend (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers236,556 edits Notification: listing at articles for deletion of Langdon K. Fieberling. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:46, 30 January 2015 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,588 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Wwoods/Archive 2014) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == Infobox power station == | |||
| Hi, Wwoods. You have been one of contributors to the {{tl|Infobox power station}} or its preceding templates. Therefore I notify you that ] is a discussion about changes to the power station infobox template. Your contribution is appreciated. ] (]) 18:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == An RfC that you ''may'' be interested in... == | |||
| As one of the previous contributors to {{Tl|Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a ] started on the talk page as to ]. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing! | |||
| : <small>This message was sent by ] (]) on behalf of <span class="nowrap">{{U|]}}</span> <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)</small> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Technical 13@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:Infobox_film/list&oldid=598721132 --> | |||
| == File:Minden an der weser.png listed for deletion == | == File:Minden an der weser.png listed for deletion == | ||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 12:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 12:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:46, 30 January 2015
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
File:Minden an der weser.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Minden an der weser.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Grantville Gazette III for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grantville Gazette III is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Grantville Gazette III until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Virginia-namesake1211.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Virginia-namesake1211.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. EoRdE6 (talk) 01:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Carl A. Weeden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl A. Weeden is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Carl A. Weeden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Langdon K. Fieberling for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Langdon K. Fieberling is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Langdon K. Fieberling until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)