Misplaced Pages

User talk:ECayce187: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:58, 31 January 2015 editECayce187 (talk | contribs)210 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 09:58, 31 January 2015 edit undoECayce187 (talk | contribs)210 edits Your request to delete this talk pageNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== Your request to delete this talk page == == Your request to delete this talk page ==
I have declined this request because user talk pages are not normally deleted, see ]. With a few exceptions, none of which apply here, you may blank anything you like from your talk pages (including this message), but the history is retained for the record. ] (]) 18:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC) I have declined this request because user talk pages are not normally deleted, see ]. With a few exceptions, none of which apply here, you may blank anything you like from your talk pages (including this message), but the history is retained for the record. ] (]) 18:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock| reason=Because I have not been vandalizing articles, or trolling,etc. anymore}} {{unblock| reason=Because I have not been vandalizing articles, or trolling,etc. anymore. And my edits have all been good, or at least mediocre.}}

Revision as of 09:58, 31 January 2015

Your request to delete this talk page

I have declined this request because user talk pages are not normally deleted, see WP:DELTALK. With a few exceptions, none of which apply here, you may blank anything you like from your talk pages (including this message), but the history is retained for the record. JohnCD (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)


This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ECayce187 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Because I have not been vandalizing articles, or trolling,etc. anymore. And my edits have all been good, or at least mediocre.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Because I have not been vandalizing articles, or trolling,etc. anymore. And my edits have all been good, or at least mediocre. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Because I have not been vandalizing articles, or trolling,etc. anymore. And my edits have all been good, or at least mediocre. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Because I have not been vandalizing articles, or trolling,etc. anymore. And my edits have all been good, or at least mediocre. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Category: