Revision as of 10:54, 31 January 2015 editECayce187 (talk | contribs)210 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:01, 31 January 2015 edit undoPhilKnight (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators126,083 edits declineNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I have declined this request because user talk pages are not normally deleted, see ]. With a few exceptions, none of which apply here, you may blank anything you like from your talk pages (including this message), but the history is retained for the record. ] (]) 18:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC) | I have declined this request because user talk pages are not normally deleted, see ]. With a few exceptions, none of which apply here, you may blank anything you like from your talk pages (including this message), but the history is retained for the record. ] (]) 18:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
{{unblock reviewed| reason=Because I have not been vandalizing articles, or trolling,etc. anymore. And my edits have all been good, or at least mediocre.|decline=I've run a checkuser, and you're {{technically indistinguishable}} to {{user|JRMillar}}. In this context, I'm declining your request to be unblocked. ] (]) 10:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed| reason=Because I have not been vandalizing articles, or trolling,etc. anymore. And my edits have all been good, or at least mediocre.|decline=I've run a checkuser, and you're {{technically indistinguishable}} to {{user|JRMillar}}. In this context, I'm declining your request to be unblocked. ] (]) 10:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)}} | ||
{{unblock| reason=Because I will not set up sockpuppet accounts or alternative accounts without wikipedia's permission in the future. I will only make sourced, responsible edits that fit in the overall flow of an article. I will not harass anyone even if they harass me, and I will not even log into other accounts without the permission of wikipedia.}} | {{unblock reviewed| reason=Because I will not set up sockpuppet accounts or alternative accounts without wikipedia's permission in the future. I will only make sourced, responsible edits that fit in the overall flow of an article. I will not harass anyone even if they harass me, and I will not even log into other accounts without the permission of wikipedia.|decline=So, you admit this is a sockpuppet account? In which case, you should log into your original account, and make an unblock request there. ] (]) 11:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 11:01, 31 January 2015
Your request to delete this talk page
I have declined this request because user talk pages are not normally deleted, see WP:DELTALK. With a few exceptions, none of which apply here, you may blank anything you like from your talk pages (including this message), but the history is retained for the record. JohnCD (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).ECayce187 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Because I have not been vandalizing articles, or trolling,etc. anymore. And my edits have all been good, or at least mediocre.
Decline reason:
I've run a checkuser, and you're Technically indistinguishable to JRMillar (talk · contribs). In this context, I'm declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 10:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).ECayce187 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Because I will not set up sockpuppet accounts or alternative accounts without wikipedia's permission in the future. I will only make sourced, responsible edits that fit in the overall flow of an article. I will not harass anyone even if they harass me, and I will not even log into other accounts without the permission of wikipedia.
Decline reason:
So, you admit this is a sockpuppet account? In which case, you should log into your original account, and make an unblock request there. PhilKnight (talk) 11:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.