| Revision as of 09:25, 1 February 2015 edit5 albert square (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators68,587 edits →February 2015: added more to message← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:45, 5 February 2015 edit undo5 albert square (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators68,587 edits You have been blocked from editing to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| == February 2015 == | == February 2015 == | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for persistent ]. You have received '''one''' vote on the talk page, that is '''not''' consensus by a long shot and it shows that you have not learned anything from your previous block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first. ] (]) 09:20, 1 February 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for persistent ]. You have received '''one''' vote on the talk page, that is '''not''' consensus by a long shot and it shows that you have not learned anything from your previous block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first. ] (]) 09:20, 1 February 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 month''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] (]) 22:45, 5 February 2015 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | |||
Revision as of 22:45, 5 February 2015
Dota 2
Hello Bryce,
I'm posting on (and starting) your talk page because I am very impressed with your recent work on the Dota 2 page. You see, I created that page over four years ago and have been its top editor ever since, bringing it all the way to Good Article status and it is now on the cusp of Featured Article status. However, I cannot continue editing Misplaced Pages regularly, which is why I am looking for a successor for taking care of the page and bringing it to FA status. Would you be interested in undertaking this task? DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 04:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Hey!
I could definitly look at taking a look at the Dota 2 page. the main things I see that keep it from FA quality is the overall tone reads like an advert to me, I've taken down a lot of the peacock phrases to try and help bring it to a more NPOV that could score QA status. but I think there might be some larger problems as well ( structure of the article as a hole ) but I'd be happy to continue to try and help get it to QA quality. I'll read all the QA articles for other sportsgames and see what motiffs we can emulate to get it to top notch.
-Bryce Carmony
January 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Executive summary, you may be blocked from editing. I've warned you before on several occasions so I'm no longer giving you the benefit of the doubt. You deliberately introduced inaccuracies into this article by altering a direct quote. It's not the first time you've done it. It I suggest you make sure it's the last. andy (talk) 00:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
That was a test edit. I meant to sandbox it so I changed it back. don't lie about vandalism so much.
License tagging for File:BoardGameSplendorLogoFairUse.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BoardGameSplendorLogoFairUse.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. andy (talk) 21:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Executive summary
Please discuss your issues further on the talk page for this article. It's been requested that the article be protected, but I'm sure you and Andyjsmith will be able to talk this out between yourselves which would avoid page protection. Panyd 14:47, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- I would like to add that please assume good faith both of you and consider dispute resolution so that to avoid page protection in future. A.Minkowiski 15:20, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
January 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Human mission to Mars. andy (talk) 22:38, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I didn't vandalize the article. I was trying to make the wording more clear. Was there something that wasn't true? I read the source material.
- This edit is gibberish. I'll give you an opportunity to correct it. andy (talk) 23:30, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- It's still gibberish. You don't understand orbital mechanics so why try to improve the text? Please restore to its original version. andy (talk) 23:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I based it off of the source material, what part doesn't make sense when you read the source material. be specific. The fact that you think those aren't words ( what gibberish actually is ) shows that you might be confused. some of the big words I don't mind helping you out with.
- Seriously final warning. Your original mistake might have been inadvertent but by refusing to correct it you're making it deliberate. I've told you that what you have written makes no technical sense. If you look at the earlier text you'll see it said the intervals were fixed by not fixed in. That's obviously a completely different thing even if you don't understdand the subject, which you obviously don't. By all means edit sections about Mars in fiction but not sections about the energy requirements for Hohmann transfers. I have no intention of getting caught up in an edit war with you so please fix that error or I'll have to report you for disruptive editing. andy (talk) 23:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Feel free to report me, maybe the 3rd time is the charm right? the source material states in, but by works as well so we can go that way no problem. if you understood how cycles worked you could see how things go in them. But no worries :) good luck reporting me yet again maybe the boy who cries wolf will win for once lol.
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bryce_Carmony reported by User:Andyjsmith (Result: ). Thank you. andy (talk) 08:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'm hoping you will respond to my question at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bryce Carmony reported by User:Andyjsmith (Result: ) in case I am the admin to close this report. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:38, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- I never revert andy's posts. I look at his objections, and then change the article to meet Misplaced Pages criteria per the Manual of Style. I'm tired of only 1 wikipedian falsely accusing me over and over again of this and that. All I do is read the Manual of Style. Read the source material. and edit articles to represent that source material in the wikipedia style.Bryce Carmony (talk) 02:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
February 2015
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 09:20, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. 5 albert square (talk) 22:45, 5 February 2015 (UTC)