Revision as of 00:20, 6 February 2015 editKelly (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers99,890 edits →Blocked: q← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:29, 6 February 2015 edit undoHJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,847 edits →Blocked: rNext edit → | ||
Line 1,097: | Line 1,097: | ||
:Or I'll unblock you myself if you agree not to restore the name again without consensus. ] | ] 00:19, 6 February 2015 (UTC) | :Or I'll unblock you myself if you agree not to restore the name again without consensus. ] | ] 00:19, 6 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
::What edit are you basing the block upon? ] <sup>]</sup> 00:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC) | ::What edit are you basing the block upon? ] <sup>]</sup> 00:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::Your series of edits to ] and the talk page, where—knowing full well that the matter was in dispute and being discussed—you restored a name that had been removed on BLP grounds, reigniting an edit war instead of joining the discussion and waiting for consensus. You must surely appreciate that concerns—however unfounded you think they are—for the real people discussed in Misplaced Pages articles come ahead of everything else? As I say, if you agree to stop restoring it until there's a consensus, I'll unblock you. ] | ] 00:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:29, 6 February 2015
Archives |
---|
John Steenhuisen
Possibly unfree File:John Steenhuisen DA.jpg
Howdy I added comments to the discussion. Let me know - User:Budgee 15:01, 10 December 2014 (SAST)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:06, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:00, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Blocked
To enforce an arbitration decision and for restoring material regarding a named, living person which had been removed on BLP grounds and which was in dispute and under active discussion on the talk page, as you did at Emma Sulkowicz, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
- You were notified of the discretionary by Viriditas last October, so this action is made in accordance with WP:NEWBLPBAN. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Exactly what is the alleged offense? Kelly 00:16, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Kelly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
No warning, rationale, or reason given for block of a contributor of many years. Kelly 00:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=No warning, rationale, or reason given for block of a contributor of many years. ] <sup>]</sup> 00:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=No warning, rationale, or reason given for block of a contributor of many years. ] <sup>]</sup> 00:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=No warning, rationale, or reason given for block of a contributor of many years. ] <sup>]</sup> 00:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- You're experienced enough to know that you don't restore material removed on BLP grounds until there's a consensus, and you can clearly see the issue is under dispute. You have also been previously notified of the BLP discretionary sanctions. Anyway, you'll need to make a statement to be copied to AE or AN—admins can't unilaterally undo AE blocks. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Or I'll unblock you myself if you agree not to restore the name again without consensus. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:19, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- What edit are you basing the block upon? Kelly 00:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Your series of edits to Emma Sulkowicz and the talk page, where—knowing full well that the matter was in dispute and being discussed—you restored a name that had been removed on BLP grounds, reigniting an edit war instead of joining the discussion and waiting for consensus. You must surely appreciate that concerns—however unfounded you think they are—for the real people discussed in Misplaced Pages articles come ahead of everything else? As I say, if you agree to stop restoring it until there's a consensus, I'll unblock you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- What edit are you basing the block upon? Kelly 00:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)