| Revision as of 18:46, 8 February 2015 editNo Matter How Dark (talk | contribs)140 edits Well, I made a right mess of this person's talk page... Apologies!← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:52, 8 February 2015 edit undoNo Matter How Dark (talk | contribs)140 edits →Arbitration rsult: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Hey, since we're both banned from a certain topic, why don't we join together in editing a topic of mutual interest? What say you? ] (]) 14:36, 7 February 2015 (UTC) | Hey, since we're both banned from a certain topic, why don't we join together in editing a topic of mutual interest? What say you? ] (]) 14:36, 7 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :I have absolutely no interest in contributing to a project which is actively punishing me for defending living people from a vicious, coordinated campaign of harassment and libel by anonymous trolls using the encyclopedia as a weapon of character assassination. ] (]) 00:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC) | :I have absolutely no interest in contributing to a project which is actively punishing me for defending living people from a vicious, coordinated campaign of harassment and libel by anonymous trolls using the encyclopedia as a weapon of character assassination. ] (]) 00:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Arbitration rsult == | |||
| Having stumbled on this whole GamerGate thing when the media began covering it, I read the decision relating to you, and I think you did right by the encyclopedia. Thanks for your work. ] (]) 18:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:52, 8 February 2015
I don't think we know each other, but I just want you to know that you have my sympathy for how the case went down, and my hope is that the vast majority of Wikipedians understand that there is a right side to the dispute, which is the side you were on. ArbCom has been making examples of out of people for years and it seems to often be a stretch, although I haven't reviewed all the diffs on behavior that they cited yet. I hope you continue as your efforts are appreciated. II | (t - c) 09:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Brianna Wu#Operation: Wu-Pocalypse
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Brianna Wu#Operation: Wu-Pocalypse. Hi, I put Brianna Wu on my watchlist to see if I could help bring a more civil process to it's editing, which I am sure is the intent of most of the editors. I see that you reverted some edits, & thought you should join in a discussion. There is an editor who would like to include some links & I am seeking your (pl.) guidance. Thanks. Peaceray (talk) 02:15, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Template:Z48
Invitation
Hey, since we're both banned from a certain topic, why don't we join together in editing a topic of mutual interest? What say you? Cla68 (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- I have absolutely no interest in contributing to a project which is actively punishing me for defending living people from a vicious, coordinated campaign of harassment and libel by anonymous trolls using the encyclopedia as a weapon of character assassination. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 00:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration rsult
Having stumbled on this whole GamerGate thing when the media began covering it, I read the decision relating to you, and I think you did right by the encyclopedia. Thanks for your work. No Matter How Dark (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)