| Revision as of 02:14, 11 September 2004 editExitControl (talk | contribs)189 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:20, 27 September 2004 edit undoShorne (talk | contribs)2,809 edits SlantedNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :I suggest removing reference to air rifle. Readers may misundertand, as if Dalai Lama aims at that hawks. Is it an important fact anyway? | :I suggest removing reference to air rifle. Readers may misundertand, as if Dalai Lama aims at that hawks. Is it an important fact anyway? | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| == Slanted == | |||
| The assertion that "China invaded Tibet in 1950" is false. Tibet was and is part of China, as even the Western powers that now pander to the Dalai Lama freely acknowledge (and acknowledged at the time). | |||
| The entire article reflects a favourable point of view towards the Dalai Lama and omits important information, such as the fact that he presided over the world's most oppressive feudal serfdom—he still does in India—and owned hundreds of slaves. In addition, he was a stooge of the CIA, a fact that he himself now admits. | |||
| ] 22:20, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:20, 27 September 2004
Is this really appropriate? : "and among supporters of the Dalai Lama are a number of Hollywood actors, most notably Richard Gere, Steven Seagal, and the Beastie Boys." -- prat
I don't think it's appropriate. It would be more appropriate to mention the approxiamate number of supporters the Dalai Lama has, what areas of the world contain a lot of supporters, or simply something generic like "the Dalai Lama has many supporters throughout the world." --Patik 00:31, Aug 5, 2004 (UTC)
- I suggest removing reference to air rifle. Readers may misundertand, as if Dalai Lama aims at that hawks. Is it an important fact anyway?
Slanted
The assertion that "China invaded Tibet in 1950" is false. Tibet was and is part of China, as even the Western powers that now pander to the Dalai Lama freely acknowledge (and acknowledged at the time).
The entire article reflects a favourable point of view towards the Dalai Lama and omits important information, such as the fact that he presided over the world's most oppressive feudal serfdom—he still does in India—and owned hundreds of slaves. In addition, he was a stooge of the CIA, a fact that he himself now admits.
Shorne 22:20, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)