| Revision as of 01:32, 24 February 2015 editRjd0060 (talk | contribs)33,499 edits →Page protection.: +com← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:40, 24 February 2015 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,301,698 editsm Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:Rjd0060/Archive 10) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| The page LPK (https://en.wikipedia.org/LPK) was removed from wikipedia while I was in the process of updating it and providing references. Can you please reinstate and I will complete the requested changes? | The page LPK (https://en.wikipedia.org/LPK) was removed from wikipedia while I was in the process of updating it and providing references. Can you please reinstate and I will complete the requested changes? | ||
| == Deletion of page Will St Leger == | |||
| Hi Ryan, Please review our deletion of page on Will St Leger ] citing 'not notable'. I believe Wiki's notability criteria had been met and as I've worked on this page and intended to update page with recent independent articles and reviews' ] | |||
| If notoabily was in doubt, discussion on talk page should be started before deletion. | |||
| (] (]) 14:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)) | |||
| :Hi ]. Note that in accordance with the ] which was cited in the deletion log, an article is deleted without reason (other than nomination in the proposed deletion process) after a PROD tag remains in place after a week. I have no personal opinion on the article. I see that it was already restored. In accordance with the same policy, that is permitted upon simple request. ] (]) 19:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Help== | |||
| Hi! I noticed that you had previously blocked IP user 66.168.88.182. Please review ] pages history and see if you think it should be blocked again. ] (]) 03:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Reply == | |||
| Hello and thanks for your post on my talk page, happy to oblige. Alas the same comments have been continued by the other party.] (]) 21:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :I see, ]. I've removed the comments and I will not hesitate to block the user if they continue. ] (]) 02:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks awfully. Kind regards.] (]) 13:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Help? == | == Help? == | ||
Revision as of 13:40, 24 February 2015
I will usually reply to messages left here on this page so check back for a response.
 Archives
|
Emily Venter
The page LPK (https://en.wikipedia.org/LPK) was removed from wikipedia while I was in the process of updating it and providing references. Can you please reinstate and I will complete the requested changes?
Help?
Hello and thank you for your time. I am a bit new to Misplaced Pages, admittedly, and I believe I need your assistance on clearing up a few things. Back in August, you seemed to have disapproved something for my sorority's wiki page. I am attempting to re-create a page for our organization and per Wiki's instructions, I needed to reach out to you. This should be lifted, correct? 01:23, 9 August 2014 Rjd0060 (talk | contribs) deleted page Alpha Sigma Rho (Expired PROD, concern was: Can't find that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Deleted at AfD in 2011.) Please let me know the next steps to take to have the page re-instated. I believe there were not a lot of verifiable sources within the page, but I will find sources to contribute to our authenticity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpha Sigma Rho Sorority (talk • contribs)
Restore Oslo (Microsoft) as user draft?
I'd like to take a shot at cleaning up the old, deleted article on the M/Oslo programming language for the Microsoft WikiProject. Would it be possible to get the article restored and moved into my user space so I can review its state and history, and hopefully get a decent article written (or at least a decent section on it in another appropriate page)? Thanks. // coldacid (talk|contrib) 20:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hi coldacid. I've moved the article to your userspace. Regards, 22:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll start reviewing (and hopefully rewriting) tonight. // coldacid (talk|contrib) 23:36, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 17:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Page protection.
The justification is that I am an admin, you are an admin; if I tell you it's up to you, it's up to you. I thought that was being friendly enough. Shame you had to make an issue out of it. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:25, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Kudpung, it is indeed a shame that an administrator feels that being an administrator is justification enough. Very well. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)