Revision as of 19:55, 24 February 2015 editMailer diablo (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators55,576 edits clarify← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:35, 25 February 2015 edit undoCabayi (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators142,265 edits →Comments by other users: r to BITE commentNext edit → | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | ||
* No ] intended. An autobiographically-titled article in which referred to another actress, Sivan sanaju, with no mention of the article's subject looks pretty much like a fantasist's A3 to me. An exact copy created under a sock-puppet (with a give-away set of initials) soon after the deletion of the first copy doesn't even merit a second thought. ] (]) 11:34, 25 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
Revision as of 11:35, 25 February 2015
Shiba Ali Khan
Shiba Ali Khan (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Shiba Ali Khan/Archive.
20 February 2015
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Sak Kas15 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Sole edit is identical recreation of autobiography, Shiba Ali Khan. Bazj (talk) 19:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- No BITE intended. An autobiographically-titled article in which the first ref checked referred to another actress, Sivan sanaju, with no mention of the article's subject looks pretty much like a fantasist's A3 to me. An exact copy created under a sock-puppet (with a give-away set of initials) soon after the deletion of the first copy doesn't even merit a second thought. Bazj (talk) 11:34, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Clerk note: Admin should check if the newly created version of the article Shiba Ali Khan is similar to the deleted one. If it is, than this is an obvious case of sockpuppetry, and no CU check is needed. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Admin comment: No CU check was performed, both versions of the article are the same. However CSD has been declined by another admin (take note of the declining comment), please take care not to WP:BITE but explain and introduce the relevant policies to the relevant users. - Mailer Diablo 19:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Categories: