| Revision as of 16:39, 8 March 2015 editAKS.9955 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,222 edits →Mansi Dovhal: Vote← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:53, 8 March 2015 edit undoT Cells (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers8,996 edits →Mansi Dovhal: ReNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| :'''Speedy Keep''': Nominator failed to notice the ''coverage'' provided in the article itself.''']]''' 16:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC) | :'''Speedy Keep''': Nominator failed to notice the ''coverage'' provided in the article itself.''']]''' 16:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::Inclusion of subject on wikipedia is beyond a passing mention and ]. Evidence of subject ] is not the same as evidence of subject existence. Evidence of subject ] requires a wide discussions of the subject in multiple independent reliable sources. A passing mention is enough for evidence of subject existence which you had shown in your article under deletion discussion here. When she becomes notable for her work in the future, we may consider a stand-alone article but ] to be a subject of encyclopedic. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:50, 8 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 11:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 11:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Comment''': The sources provided is just an evidence that she's doing her job as a non-notable actress and not an evidence of meeting our ]. | |||
| :I took my time to check the references/sources one-by-one. Ref 1 is ] and that is not a reliable source. Ref 2 discussed the movie titled "Rakhtbeej" in detail and not the subject of the article. Ref 5 is a mere photo-gallery of ]. Ref 4 and 6 discussed the same ] in detail with a passing mention of the subject of this article and everyone will agree with me that ]. Ref 7 look promising but not enough to merit an encyclopedic article for now, perhaps ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:50, 8 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:53, 8 March 2015
Mansi Dovhal
- Mansi Dovhal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of the article fail WP:GNG. I can't find the significant coverages in reliable sources that established the subject notability, perhaps WP:TOOSOON if ever. WP:IMDB is not a reliable sources. Wikic¤l¤gy 11:35, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep: Nominator failed to notice the coverage provided in the article itself. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Inclusion of subject on wikipedia is beyond a passing mention and notability is not inherited. Evidence of subject notability is not the same as evidence of subject existence. Evidence of subject notability requires a wide discussions of the subject in multiple independent reliable sources. A passing mention is enough for evidence of subject existence which you had shown in your article under deletion discussion here. When she becomes notable for her work in the future, we may consider a stand-alone article but too soon to be a subject of encyclopedic. Wikic¤l¤gy 19:50, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy 11:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: The sources provided is just an evidence that she's doing her job as a non-notable actress and not an evidence of meeting our inclusion criteria.
- I took my time to check the references/sources one-by-one. Ref 1 is WP:IMDB and that is not a reliable source. Ref 2 discussed the movie titled "Rakhtbeej" in detail and not the subject of the article. Ref 5 is a mere photo-gallery of Aamir Khan. Ref 4 and 6 discussed the same Aamir Khan in detail with a passing mention of the subject of this article and everyone will agree with me that notability is not inherited. Ref 7 look promising but not enough to merit an encyclopedic article for now, perhaps WP:TOOSOON. Wikic¤l¤gy 19:50, 8 March 2015 (UTC)