| Revision as of 22:20, 8 March 2015 editDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 edits explanation please← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:28, 8 March 2015 edit undoNorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,477 edits →Explain pleaseNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ==Explain please== | ==Explain please== | ||
| What do you mean by ? ] <small>]</small> 22:20, 8 March 2015 (UTC) | What do you mean by ? ] <small>]</small> 22:20, 8 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :It's pretty obvious, isn't it? A significant media outlet publishes an article critical of Misplaced Pages's response to Gamergate; several users who appear sympathetic to Gamergate engage in an edit-war to remove any mention of that article from the article talk page; and you leap on punitive action against another user who simply noted that some of those same users had previously demanded that an anonymous attack blog be inserted into the article. Such a comment is not a ''personal'' comment, it is a comment on editorial activities. You appear to have adopted the same attitude as ArbCom did when they topic-banned me; to wit, sweep everyone under the rug and hope the problem goes away. I'm disappointed and dismayed that you have taken such a position. ] (]) 22:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:28, 8 March 2015
Cutting the Gordian Knot
So... are you ok with the article being posted on wikipedia? (Being vague as possible in case your not, so there's no indicators as to what it is)Bosstopher (talk) 19:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- I made on-the-record statements to a significant media outlet and I have no problem with them being linked or republished anywhere. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 20:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Explain please
What do you mean by this comment? Dreadstar ☥ 22:20, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- It's pretty obvious, isn't it? A significant media outlet publishes an article critical of Misplaced Pages's response to Gamergate; several users who appear sympathetic to Gamergate engage in an edit-war to remove any mention of that article from the article talk page; and you leap on punitive action against another user who simply noted that some of those same users had previously demanded that an anonymous attack blog be inserted into the article. Such a comment is not a personal comment, it is a comment on editorial activities. You appear to have adopted the same attitude as ArbCom did when they topic-banned me; to wit, sweep everyone under the rug and hope the problem goes away. I'm disappointed and dismayed that you have taken such a position. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 22:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)